Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Charles Gryba who wrote (62979)	11/8/2001 2:20:14 PM
From: porn_start878	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

if hammer comes out at 2Ghz and performs like a 4Ghz Athlon The model/platform isn't specified in this comparison. There is a huge performance gap between a 1GHz Athlon Classic on a KX133 board w 200Mhz bus and an hypothetical 1GHz Athlon XP on a KT266A w 266MHz bus. Probably in the 15-40% range. I strongly suspect that the former was used in the comparison. Max

To: Charles Gryba who wrote (62979)	11/8/2001 2:23:34 PM
From: jcholewa	Respond to of 275872

> if hammer comes out at 2Ghz and performs like a 4Ghz > Athlon that's tremendous. What do you think Intel will > have out there that will even come close at the end of > 2002? The Athlon HP (or whatever they call it) 4000+ is slated for "2003H1", which usually would mean "2003/06" (June) production shipments. That's six months after the end of 2002. For the end of 2002, Intel merely needs to compete against the Athlon HP 3400+.