SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (201423)11/8/2001 5:30:17 PM
From: DMaA  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Is it an example of a True Oxymoron? Or would it be a False Oxymoron? Now I'm bothered too.



To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (201423)11/8/2001 5:36:16 PM
From: FastC6  Respond to of 769670
 
LOL!

. .



To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (201423)11/8/2001 5:53:03 PM
From: Jagfan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
I guess I should have said insincere and a liar. I guess I pulled a GWB, but I bet you know exactly who I was referring to.



To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (201423)11/8/2001 6:16:59 PM
From: Ish  Respond to of 769670
 
<<What the heck is an "insincere liar"? >>

Redundant.



To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (201423)11/8/2001 6:41:53 PM
From: Thehammer  Respond to of 769670
 
What the heck is an "insincere liar"?

It depends on the meaning of is

Perhaps taken in the context of the legal, grammatical interpretation of the words meaning one thing and actually conveying / communicating something entirely different, this makes sense.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News