Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Canadian REITS, Trusts & Dividend Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lorne Larson who wrote (1833)	11/8/2001 7:56:20 PM
From: Peter W. Panchyshyn	Respond to of 11633

I decided the guy had no credibility after it became apparent that he had no idea that Canadian producers quoted their NG sales in Canadian (not U.S.) dollars. Even after about 5 posters directed him to sites that proved him wrong he refused to acknowledge that he could possibly be wrong. Truly one of the most egotistical personalities I have encountered on any site. ------------ Well and what of your credibility. You said the trusts were selling ngas at huge losses. You even dared me to talk to the trusts themselves. I did and they answered NO. I told you to look at the historical prices of ngas to see what the trusts were selling ngas for in the past and still making money and distributing that to unitholders. Talk about being dead wrong. And yes lets talk of being dead wrong. Shorting NCF.UN and SHN.UN. Not buying anything at anywhere near any lows whatsoever. Good call on that. Now who really refuses to acknowledge that he is wrong. Especially when it comes to what is happening in the REAL WORLD and what the REAL DATA show. And more importantly who is making REAL MONEY and even maintaining worth and increasing monthly income all at the same time ----------------------- ------------ Now given the being wrong about $US or $CDN as opposed to being wrong when it comes to making real money with these trusts (or losses in your case). I wonder which is the most important or significant?????????? Simple math tells all that a realized loss is much more serious a matter. Again good calls on the shorts and the missed opportunities. How big is your next trade going to have to be to recoup from that and how likely is that given your track record? ---------------- Blast away Peter. You're still on ignore and will remain forever on ignore. ----------- Funny but ignoring questions of your not so superior methods does not make the results of your actions any different.. You have been dead wrong. I and others can see why you don't want to acknowledge that one simple fact. ---------------------------