Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pezz who wrote (11019)	11/8/2001 11:16:41 PM
From: Cogito Ergo Sum	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 74559

This is all well and good but can both you guys learn to spell analyst please :o) I had nothing important to add but I felt like posting ;o)

To: pezz who wrote (11019)	11/8/2001 11:37:13 PM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74559

<My whole point is that fundamental research is useless> But your point was I can't do better than all those resources.... [analysts]: "Resources that I'm talkin about are hoards of annalists who spend 40 hrs a week studying the company and its prospects and are wrong more often than they are right...But with your limited resources you think that you can do better ...Good Luck!" Message 16629185 Now you're saying all they do is worthless.... so what were you even bringing it up for the??? Speaking of DOLTS!! ROFLMAO! Besides, we disagree on that premise. Even trading flows I alsways did better doing fundamental stories and fundamental differences between stocks within the groups. Let's just agree to disagree agreeably :) DAK