Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : T/FIF, a New Plateau -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: scaram(o)uche who wrote (730)	11/9/2001 10:21:14 AM
From: scaram(o)uche	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2243

ditto for "2000"...... at current bid of 1.08. take photo if desired............ siliconinvestor.com Off 94% since addition to the portfolio. One of my all-time great calls.

To: scaram(o)uche who wrote (730)	11/9/2001 4:04:41 PM
From: RCMac	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2243

>> Thanks to BJ and TD for pointers that make me want to completely abandon support for the stock [GLIA] << Rick, I've been looking at GLIA's potential legal liability (class actions, etc.) issue, in response to your inquiry on the [hold nose here] Yahoo GLIA thread, although I've not been able to get a call back from GLIA IR so I can ask about the insurance situation (defense costs and settlement payments in most securities class actions are often mostly covered by insurance -- at least at settlement, dicier at trial -- but I haven't seen anything about insurance in a quick scan of the SEC documents, so I've tried yesterday and today to get info from IR). You'd asked over there: >> Can Adcon be isolated, creating a little "sue me!" pocket in the company that leaves 2331 and anti-properdin running free? << Very unlikely. You may be thinking of the settlements of asbestos and some other cases that attached liability solely to one part of company that split apart, leaving the other free to go forward without of the threatened liability. Those could only be imposed by a bankruptcy court, putting into effect a plan of reorganization, and were only viable where substantial assets were available to pay the eventual liability. Nothing like that here. Do you still care? If not I'll stop chasing IR. And could you tell us what the "pointers" were? --RCM