SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Climber who wrote (9584)11/9/2001 9:35:48 PM
From: Selectric II  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
Officials of the Bush administration are also worried that victory might be tarnished by looting and reprisals by the Northern Alliance fighters in Mazar-i-Sharif.

To my understanding, this kind of bullsh** -- looting, rape, and plundering of the vanquished -- is exactly what gave rise to the Taliban in the first place.

We need to find a way to encourage effective self-policing of the victorious Northern Alliance so they don't repeat history and alienate the very people they're liberating. Won't be as much of an issue where they just occupied and are popular with their fellow tribesmen as it will be down the road -- literally -- in Kabul and the south. Whether it's with pleas, praise, land, title, financial backing, etc., we must do what we can to encourage them to maintain the high road.

They are liberators, not conquerors, and can earn a well-deserved place of respect.



To: Climber who wrote (9584)11/10/2001 3:23:37 AM
From: FaultLine  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 281500
 
it would provide a badly needed public relations boost for a military operation that has been long on airstrikes — more than 8,000 bombs have been dropped in the fighting — but devoid of gains on the ground.

is it just me or is this truly ridiculous?
fl