To: Raymond Duray who wrote (250 ) 11/10/2001 3:28:47 AM From: marcos Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1293 5 pieces of wood cost Slocan $10m Company charges U.S. used gift as foundation to build case for dumping Gordon Hamilton Vancouver Sun Friday, November 09, 2001 A gift to charity of five pieces of lumber is going to cost Slocan Forest Products more than $10 million in anti-dumping duties after U.S. investigators used the lumber as evidence the Richmond-based company is dumping into the American market. The U.S. commerce department made an error by placing a value on the donation and then refused to correct it, slapping a 19.2-per-cent anti-dumping duty on Slocan last week, company president Jim Shepherd charged Thursday. The outraged Slocan president called the lumber donation "the tale of the $10 million picnic table" that "makes a mockery of commercial reality. "This tiny quantity of wood, five lonely two-by-fours donated to charity was used as a benchmark for arriving at the punishing duty our company faces today," Shepherd said. "To call it absurd is an understatement." Shepherd accused the U.S. of deliberately distorting the charitable transaction -- a gift to Kootenay Women in Trades and Technology -- to put political pressure on Canada over the softwood lumber war. The charity which promotes women in construction and related occupations used the donation to frame a shed. Slocan donated a variety of lumber sizes but it was the five 12-foot two-by-fours -- enough to make a picnic table -- the U.S. commerce department zeroed in on. U.S. investigators compared the price Slocan listed in its books for the donated wood against the value of all 12-foot two-by-fours Slocan sold into the U.S. market over a 12-month period. Slocan had entered the lumber as a book entry in one ledger sheet for inventory purposes only and identified it in another as a charitable donation, resulting in the lumber having no value. But the investigators used only the first entry, showing the lumber at $30, an estimate of what the lumber would have been worth on the day it was donated. That entry was above the value of similar lumber Slocan sold over a 12-month period in the United States. "It has no relevance in any comparison of pricing," Shepherd said. "However, it was used as a comparison of pricing." Commerce ignored Slocan's protests that the lumber was not sold, even when Slocan presented both book entries to commerce officials, Shepherd said. Shepherd said the duty added up to three per cent to Slocan's total 19.2 per cent anti-dumping duty. That three per cent adds up to $10.5 million a year for the company. It was one of many mistakes commerce officials made in setting the anti-dumping duty, the Slocan president said. Shepherd met later Thursday with Prime Minister Jean Chretien along with other B.C. lumber producers to urge Chretien "to get down to serious discussions" with the Americans about the lumber war. "The message today is the folly of the process. How we can take a business as important as this to our country -- the lumber business -- and be subject to this kind of attack and this kind of rationale for these duties," Shepherd said. B.C. producers, who account for more than half the country's $10 billion annual trade in lumber with the United States, favour a negotiated settlement over a protracted litigation through the World Trade Organization but have begun fighting back. Earlier this week Canfor Corp, Canada's largest lumber producer, filed an action under a NAFTA provision against the U.S. government claiming $250 million in damages. Shepherd said Slocan is also considering a similar action. Slocan is one of six Canadian forest companies investigated by the U.S. commerce department and hit with preliminary anti-dumping duties Oct. 31 ranging from six per cent for West Fraser Timber to Slocan at the top with 19.2 per cent. All other Canadian companies were levied an average rate of 12.5 per cent. Slocan has been hit with a total of 38.5 per cent in both anti-dumping and countervailing duties, a situation that the company cannot tolerate, Shepherd said. He said Slocan has not been dumping timber. In response to the U.S. allegations that Slocan must be doing something wrong because it can operate when other U.S. companies are forced down by markets, he cited a 2000 PricewaterhouseCoopers financial study that identified Slocan as the top forest company in North America. The Canadian lumber issue has had a low profile in the United States. When the anti-dumping duty was announced Oct. 31, Commerce Secretary Don Evans issued a terse statement saying only that the duty determination was "based on facts received before the department with active participation of all parties." © Copyright 2001 Vancouver Suncanada.com {315DA7CE-DFB0-491A-AB0E-681D58F0A0CF} [end quote] - this is just one example of the way the Kommerzwaffe plays with numbers to achieve their objectives, there are many many more