Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pravin Kamdar who wrote (63332)	11/10/2001 10:00:18 PM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 275872

PK, "You clearly know that Paul was not suspended for his pro-Intel and anti-AMD stance, but for his persistent violation of the rules (law)." BS. If murder is against the law, you don't only punish mass murders, you punish all that violate the law. It has been "clearly" demonstrated that many AMD fans violate the rules. No response, a free pass. Engel was the most effective at countering the AMD world domination crap on this thread. Mostly right, rarely wrong, he cut through a lot of fantasy. As AMD investors (fans?), I can understand how that would make you uncomfortable, day, after day, after day. The reason he was banned is that truth is painful. If you really think he would have been banned if he was pro-AMD, you are lying to yourself. You guys would think he was charming and witty if he was a droid. What would the vote have been, honestly, if Paul were pro-AMD? You guys can do whatever you want. But at least admit that it's the content, more than the the style, that pissed you off. Be honest with yourself. John