SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JohnM who wrote (9731)11/10/2001 8:54:57 PM
From: Selectric II  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Get off it, Professor John. Not only did you proclaim many moons ago that I seemed to need to have the last word (you then had what you thought was the last word), but you're also the one carrying Seymour Hersh's torch with many others here.

You claimed you don't have a dog in this fight, and you tried to ridicule those who would disagree with you (or Hersh). However, from the intensity and duration of your unusual interest in this, it seems clear that you do have a dog in this fight, although you haven't disclosed to us what your connection with Seymour Hersh is. Well, now it's time to disclose.



To: JohnM who wrote (9731)11/11/2001 2:09:02 AM
From: Doc Bones  Respond to of 281500
 
JohnM,

I thought Woodward's sources were the "bold champion of the people," and the ones that wouldn't talk to him the "weasely bureaucrat." <g> Woodward's detractors claim that if you won't open up to him you're liable to go down in history as the "sniveling, grasping rat" or whatever, and that's how he gets such access.

Just what his critics say, I don't know if there's any truth to that, or to the persistent rumor that you are yourself in fact: Bob Woodward!!!

Doc


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News