SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Network Appliance -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RoseCampion who wrote (9485)11/10/2001 11:27:08 PM
From: Jacob Snyder  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 10934
 
Thanks.

I do hold 2003 and 2004 calls. The 2004s, I intend on holding till about June 2003, or perhaps exercising them just before expiration (if I continue to like the LT story, and they are far in the money).

I would try to sell shorter-term calls, when I think the stock has had a big ST unsustainable runup, and I want to limit my risk in case of a big pullback. I would probably just let them expire (hopefully worthless). I haven't found any specific discussion of this scenario in any tax book, or in any IRS publication (and I've looked). I think I could argue that two calls (same stock, same strike price) are not "substantially identical" if one has an expiration date 2-4 months out, and the other is 2+ years out.

If I sold some nearer-term calls, and the stock kept on going up, then (when I get called), I would probably also sell some of the 2003 calls I already hold, at the same time.

And, as you say, if the transaction in the shorter-term calls is in 2001 and 2002, and I hold my longer-term calls till 2003 or 2004, it's unlikely the IRS will even notice.

Thanks again for your input.