Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Platinum & Gold (GPGI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: d:oug who wrote (13705)	11/13/2001 12:19:26 AM
From: d:oug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14226

"... others can add to this list." (or) do a Hareholder Punt Thats right folks, all those discussions from those who once again took as truTh the text of these recent Global press releases have once again found smoke aRising from their @ssholes. Lets see, a share price was a dime before the company news, then went to 1/4 or more i think, and now it back to a dime. Golly, makes you wonder if this has happened in the past 20 years with Global's great sounding news releases. (not a question) Anyone follow those other companies reported to be "seened" with Global? Los Ness monster, Big Foot, Area 51 & Global. a. Bad News + b. Bad News a. TwiTurd's process works but Global ain't own it. b. TwiTurd's process does not work and Global owns it. duh time ab w/ ab(hex) (or) 171 w/ golly, that number 9 again w/ 171 w/ 1+7+1=9 ragingbull.lycos.com By: NotRichYet Reply To: stock_lover_00 Monday, 12 Nov 2001 As time marches on and no progress or clarification made on any front with this company, I'm getting concerned... ... we again have a firm grip on the short end of the stick. WHY? Depents on who you have talked to in this company... ... with time passing nothing has happened. Things don't jive. 1. If what I was told is true that ON SITE GPGI has and has had for quite some time all the equiptment & chemicals necessary to run a 10 ton per week production. Then why the need for $1 million in financing? 2. ... there is a question of intellectual property here. 3. It would be easier to get financing if they were producing even a small amount on a regular basis on site or off site to demonstrate that it can be done. Have not heard of any... 4. Four outfits have access to the process (rightly or otherwise) yet none are producing. Any claims otherwise so far have been hype or hoax... 5. Palmer agreed to sell his propery for $4 million (I think) and walk away. At one time the company said he had been paid. He is still waiting. WHY? 6. If one had checked on progress of financing in August, September, October, or November it was in final stage of completion and should be finalized in a day or two if not later today... ... all is not as it seems. Raging Bull © Copyright 2001, Lycos, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Lycos® is a registered trademark of Carnegie Mellon University.