Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan3 who wrote (147445)	11/11/2001 5:56:59 PM
From: herb will	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Dan, "I cheated, I recalled it from looking at their 10Qs:" From recently released earnings reports; Revs 9/30/01 Intel $6.5 Billion AMD .765 Billion Intel revenues are over 8x AMD revenues. Dan, call a psychiatrist tomorrow. Tell him you need to have your head examined and also tell him that he will have to use a microscope. Herb

To: Dan3 who wrote (147445)	11/11/2001 7:47:19 PM
From: Dave	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Dan, Why not compare revenues? How about gross margins?

To: Dan3 who wrote (147445)	11/11/2001 8:05:35 PM
From: wanna_bmw	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Dan, Re: "Intel Operating costs and expenses $6,156 Million AMD Operating costs and expenses $995 Million" Dan, those are not the costs for Intel to make microprocessors. Those are the costs that Intel made to turn one of the worlds largest companies around 90 degrees to cope with a changing economy. A very large portion of this includes stock buyback, acquisitions, ramping of fab capacity, and R&D. To suggest that this is what Intel invests in the cost of their chips shows how misleading to try to represent yourself. Care to justify yourself on this, or should I just assume it's due to ignorance? wanna_bmw