SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : GENI: GenesisIntermedia.com Inc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: blebovits who wrote (361)11/12/2001 1:57:14 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 574
 
Just as I though. CRIMLEMS northernlight.com



To: blebovits who wrote (361)11/12/2001 2:13:33 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 574
 
See Willow Cove got their ENERGY from Hampton Porter ex analyst? Wasnt Hampton Poster riddled with fraud?

Audio: Analyst: Microsoft Will Still Have a Relationship with AT&T

64% - Articles & General info: Story Filed: Thursday, September 21, 2000 4:26 PM EST (ON24 via COMTEX)-- Todd Pitcher, Sr. Technology Analyst at Hampton Porter, says Microsoft's relationship ... 09/21/2000
ON24 (newswire): Available at Northern Light



To: blebovits who wrote (361)11/12/2001 2:55:52 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 574
 
Todd Pitcher Willow Cove analyst pushing Energy Power was from this prestigious firm. I have research that shows this firm was connected to organized crime. Why would Todd Pitcher be so keen on Energy Power?

Hampton-Porter, a brokerage house with a history of disciplinary actions and lawsuits against it, has abruptly departed its office in downtown San Diego.

The firm most recently had been at 101 W. Broadway. "No one is in the suite. They are not answering their phones. No one is there to comment," says the manager of the building. The firm was a sub- tenant, but she would not reveal who has the lease.

Customers of Hampton-Porter complained to me that they could not get through. I couldn't reach the firm through its usual numbers. Neither could Patrick Keegan of Krause & Kalfayan, lead lawyer in a civil securities fraud case against the firm.

"I think they are completely gone. Their Web site has been shut down," Keegan says.

I phoned New York lawyer Simon Kogan, who has represented Hampton- Porter in the past. He no longer does, won't say why, and says he has no idea where the firm might be.

What might lead the firm to close down? "Nice try," Kogan laughs.

Attorney Paul Delmore of San Diego is representing Hampton-Porter in two arbitrations, but he decided not to defend it in the civil class-action suits.

"They would have cost a tremendous amount of money to defend," Delmore says. "I have not been officially informed that they have closed their doors," but there has been such discussion.

Until late last year, the firm had been at One America Plaza. "They did not leave with monies owing," says manager Marie Giere.

Nancy Condon, spokeswoman for the National Association of Securities Dealers, or NASD, in Washington, D.C., says the firm has not filed a broker-dealer withdrawal form. "Customers should contact the clearing firm," she says.

Ah, but that's the rub.

"I don't know what is going on with Hampton-Porter," says an official of the clearing firm, Denver-based Fiserv Correspondent Services. "They haven't filed a broker-dealer withdrawal form. We haven't been notified that they are no longer in business."

She declines to say whether trades have been cleared recently. The Fiserv attorney in that office did not return calls.

Last year and early this year, Hampton-Porter faced a number of civil suits. The main ones claim that it and its personnel manipulated the stock of En Pointe Technologies in El Segundo.

A suit by Krause & Kalfayan claims that John William Laurienti and Gregory Walker of Hampton-Porter "orchestrated the pump-and-dump scheme in conjunction with insiders of En Pointe Technologies."

(In a pump-and-dump ploy, a stock is hyped to the heavens and manipulated upward, enabling insiders to sell at large profits.) At the time of the filing, Walker vigorously denied the allegations.

The suit describes Laurienti as "a recidivist stock manipulator," stating that in 1995 the Securities and Exchange Commission barred him from the business for failure to discharge his supervisory duties in an unregistered stock offering.

He has concealed his role at Hampton-Porter, the suit claims.

NASD records show that in 1995, the SEC barred Laurienti from the business for two years and fined him $10,000 for failure to supervise brokers pushing a Canadian penny stock.

The main offending broker sold more than 60,000 shares of the penny stock without disclosing that he was receiving $234,000 in kickbacks, according to NASD records.

Securities regulators in Massachusetts had investigated the matter, suspended Laurienti, and recommended that the SEC investigate. That same year, Maryland denied Laurienti's registration, according to NASD records.

Walker is defending a case alleging failure to supervise, NASD records show.

Last year, Alabama issued a cease-and-desist against Hampton- Porter. It had sold stocks in the state, which had requested more information several times and received none from the firm.

In 1999, when under a different name, the firm was fined $1,000 by the NASD for misreporting trades.

Don Bauder's e-mail address is don.bauder@uniontrib.com. His phone number is (619) 293-1523.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



To: blebovits who wrote (361)11/12/2001 3:08:12 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 574
 
Todd Pitcher Boiler Room Analyst. Its right here. Pushing Energy Power. Mark Bergman of Access1Financial and Regis Possino fame also worked at the Boiler Room Hampton Porter. Possino the convicted criminal also ran the Daily affairs of General Commerce Bank ag which was Khashoggi's bank in Austria which was recently raided by FBI. How do you know Todd?

Energy Power Buys Gas Reserves -- By doubling its stake in a large Alberta natural gas property, Energy Power Systems (EPS) Limited is dramatically ramping up its production capabilities on the drilling and exploration side, according to one analyst

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Story Filed: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 5:55 PM EST

Vancouver, Jun 19, 2001 (Stockgroup.com via COMTEX) -- By doubling its stake in a large Alberta natural gas property, Energy Power Systems (EPS) Limited (OTC BB: EYPSF) (CDNX: V.YPX) is dramatically ramping up its production capabilities on the drilling and exploration side, says a Seattle-based covering analyst.

Todd Pitcher of Willow Cove Investment Group Inc. says the company's decision to increase its interest in the nine-section Sibbald, Alberta property to an average 50% should improve Energy Power Systems' cash flow position significantly.

"It should put them in a position to tap into a large amount of reserves and translate into a meaningful amount of cash," he says.

The property, which consists of about 5,760 acres of land, currently has three producing gas wells with additional opportunities for further exploration and production recovery, the company said in a news release.

"The acquisition of these producing wells will increase cash flow to EPS and the additional land block should form part of our summer exploration and drilling program," said Sandra Hall, vice president of Corporate Affairs.

This is not the first Alberta acquisition for Toronto-based EPS in 2001. In April, the company acquired 25% ownership in a producing gas property in the Bigstone/Kaybob area.

EPS also has major interests in Atlantic Canada. Last February, the company acquired a 25% interest in 500,000 acres of oil and gas exploration property on Prince Edward Island.

The company's aggressive pace of acquisitions is dramatically broadening its production capacity, according to Pitcher.

"The real bang for the buck comes from the drilling side," he notes. "As EPS acquires more properties it will translate into a significant revenue flow influx."

One of the company's strengths is its business model, he adds.

"[President] Jim Cassina has developed a model that makes a lot of sense. It consists of an oil and gas division, an engineering & offshore division and a power division. Among those three divisions you should see a less choppy growth pattern than with companies who focus strictly on drilling."

The engineering & offshore division is currently working on contracts worth $5.5 million and Pitcher says EPS is well positioned to take advantage of build-out opportunities created by increased E&P activity offshore Atlantic Canada.

"A lot of larger companies are starting projects but they won't build out facilities themselves. Instead they'll outsource to smaller companies like EPS, which has a 147,000 square foot platform facility. That gives EPS considerable engineering power to garner a significant amount of new business."

According to EPS, construction of the floating production, storage and off-loading platform for the White Rose oil field owned by Husky Energy Inc. (TSE: T.HSE) is expected to receive the go-ahead late this summer. That could feed further growth for its engineering and offshore division in the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2001, the company said.

Another factor that bodes well for the company's fortunes is its anticipated listing with the American Stock Exchange later this year.

Pitcher says the company has gone through the first stage of the process and barring any unexpected developments, the listing "should happen sooner rather than later.

"Their last obstacle was getting the share price and market cap steady and those are holding their own pretty well. Fortunately, the company is in a relatively strong position where it doesn't absolutely need financing. It's pursuing an inorganic acquisition model at a measured pace, although if financing comes to them on their terms I think we'll see that pace pick up."

EPS's current valuation makes sense, says Pitcher, who rates it a 'long-term speculative buy.' However, he says there is upside in the stock and with the prospect of an AMEX listing on the horizon, it creates the likelihood of a broader more diversified investor base.

"Pending the awarding of a few expected Atlantic contracts there are catalysts in place that bode well for a higher valuation."

EPS closed 35 cents or 11.29% higher today at $3.45.

Energy Power Systems is a client of Stockgroup Holdings Inc., the parent company of smallcapcenter.com.

By JoAnne Sommers

Copyright 2001 Stockgroup.com, All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2001, Stockgroup, all rights reserved.



To: blebovits who wrote (361)11/12/2001 3:21:44 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 574
 
For more information contact, Todd M. Pitcher, Senior Technology Analyst of Hampton Porter Investment Bankers, 800-545-3345.

MOT knocked down to 32 on upgrade with target of 58:

Friday June 23, 11:46 am Eastern Time
Company Press Release
SOURCE: Hampton Porter Investment Bankers
Hampton Porter Investment Bankers Initiates Coverage of Motorola, Inc. with STRONG BUY rating (MOT - 33 3/4)
SAN DIEGO, June 23 /PRNewswire/ -- The following is being issued by Hampton Porter Investment Bankers, a member of the National Association of Securities Dealers, CRD number 42949:
Comments:
-- Motorola (NYSE: MOT - news) should see significant margin expansion through
2000 and moving forward.
-- The outlook for wireless infrastructure is extremely positive and
Motorola is experiencing a ramp in sales volume in this space.
-- Motorola is extremely well positioned in the emerging enhanced
television market.

Investment Thesis:

Motorola continues to benefit from increased sales and lower costs due to recent restructuring. We anticipate this trend to continue. The company is poised to exploit significant growth trends in the wireless infrastructure, broadband, enhanced television, and semiconductor markets and should see their top line revenue growth impacted positively as a consequence. Based on Motorola's increasing leadership position across these industries, we are giving Motorola a 12-month valuation of 55x forward earnings, or $58 and a Strong Buy Rating.

For more information contact, Todd M. Pitcher, Senior Technology Analyst of Hampton Porter Investment Bankers, 800-545-3345.

SOURCE: Hampton Porter Investment Bankers



To: blebovits who wrote (361)11/12/2001 4:09:40 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 574
 
Texas couple say S.D. securities firm wiped out their million

July 7, 2000

A Texas husband and wife who run a Christian bookstore and summer camp charge that the San Diego brokerage Hampton-Porter wiped out their $1.2 million assets by putting them in speculative stocks, and on heavy margin without their authorization.

San Diego attorney Ronald A. Marron filed an arbitration action against the firm and its officers, along with certain other entities, this week with the National Association of Securities Dealers, or NASD.

"NASD arbitrations are designed to be confidential," says Hampton-Porter's New York attorney, Simon Kogan. "I am disturbed that a statement of claim was released to the press by a party to the arbitral forum." He wouldn't discuss other matters in the case.

"They can run, but they can't hide," says Marron, arguing for more public disclosure.

Steven and Jenifer Crosby of New Braunfels, Texas, say they got a cold call from a Hampton-Porter broker, who told them he could provide them with returns that were at least average with the market, using conservative investment strategies, with most of the money in a diversified mutual fund.

They transferred their $1.2 million to the firm, which is located downtown.

According to the arbitration complaint, the Crosbys were soon told that Bryan Laurienti of Hampton-Porter would be trading their account. He told them he would be using margin (investing with borrowed funds) and trade in options, but never explained the risks, according to the complaint.

The value of the account rose to $3.2 million -- but a full $1.2 million was on margin, says the complaint. In February of this year, the Crosbys flew to San Diego and met with Laurienti, their original broker, and another official.

The Crosbys wanted their margin cut in half in six weeks, then reduced until it was gone. And they wanted more conservative mutual funds. The firm never followed the instructions, according to the complaint.

Laurienti put the Crosbys heavily into El Segundo-based En Pointe Technologies, an e-commerce stock. But he did not tell the Crosbys that he had increased their margin account to $2 million, according to the complaint. So they had no way of knowing that their February instructions were not being followed, they say.

En Pointe hit $47.38 on Feb. 25, and then plunged. Yesterday it closed at $7.75, down 25 cents. Recently, it slashed 15 percent of its work force.

Crosby claims that he was informed by several Hampton-Porter brokers that an En Pointe official had paid the brokerage $1.5 million to support the stock. "That is totally incorrect," says Javed Latif, En Pointe's chief financial officer.

Eventually, the mutual funds had to be liquidated to pay the margin debt.

The Crosbys learned that Bryan Laurienti's brother, John William Laurienti, also with Hampton-Porter, along with Gregory Dubois Walker, president of the firm, owned 522,700 shares of En Pointe.

According to NASD records, the Securities and Exchange Commission in 1995 barred John Laurienti from acting as a supervisor (although he was permitted to reapply later) and fined him $10,000.

In 1994, the Massachusetts Division of Securities found that John Laurienti had failed to discharge his supervisory responsibilities properly.

John Laurienti's and Walker's margin calls had crashed En Pointe stock, according to the complaint.

In a declaration accompanying the complaint, former Hampton-Porter broker Adam G. Gilman says he was "offered an incentive payment" to sell En Pointe stock.

Gilman's NASD credentials are hardly imposing: He worked for La Jolla Capital, later renamed Pacific Cortez Securities, which was closed down by the Department of Corporations for violations resulting from its high-pressure peddling of low-quality stocks.

Gilman was disciplined by Oklahoma securities regulators while he was with La Jolla Capital. Last fall, San Diegan Mark Roberts complained to me that his account plunged from $8,000 to $2,000 under Gilman, who wouldn't carry out sales when requested.
===================================================

CONTACT: En Pointe Technologies Inc. (ENPT)
Mark Bergman or Chris Djernaes, 800/545-3345

Hampton-Porter Investment Bankers Announces Investment Opinion: Global Equities Research Sales Notes

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Story Filed: Tuesday, July 13, 1999 5:15 AM EST

SAN DIEGO, Jul 13, 1999 (BUSINESS WIRE via COMTEX) --

Market Cap (Mil) 35.24M Price to Book 1.33
Avg. Daily Volume 46.7K Price to Sales .06
Shares Out (Mil) 5.935M ROE -12.10%
Float Shares (Mil) 3.21M LT Debt to
Capital 21%
Institutional Holdings 9.72% Proj. 3-year
growth rate 35%
No. of Institutions 11 Beta 1.63
52-week Range (NASDQ) 2 1/2-10 1/2 Monthly % Change -9.70%

FYE Sept. 30 1996 1997 1998 1999E
---- ---- ---- -----
Dec .20 .23 .28 -.01
Mar .10 .22 .04 -.76(a)
June .26 .25 .12 .05E
Sept .21 .26 .03 .11E
--- --- --- ----
Total .77 .96 .47

Rev 345.1 491.4 567.7 662.4

(a)Reflects closure of facility, related charge-off, accelerated restructuring.

Recommendation
We are recommending purchase of shares of En Pointe for the following reasons: First, the Company has turned around its core business, and we are projecting Q3/99 revenues (quarter just completed) to reach $165 million with an estimated EPS of $.05; Second, we believe the Company will shortly announce its completion of a $5 million private round of financing for its Firstsource subsidiary-reducing the current financial burden on corporate; and Third, we believe the Company will spin-off and take public this subsidiary for a total market value of $200-to-$300 million. If En Pointe retains a 50% post-IPO stake in Firstsource, it will add between $15 and $23 to its current market value.

Hampton Porter, All rights reserved.
This material is for your private information, and we are not soliciting any action based upon it. This report is not to be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell any securities in any jurisdiction where such an offer or solicitation would be illegal. The material is based upon information that we consider reliable but we do not guarantee that it is accurate or complete, and it should not be relied upon as such. Opinions expressed are current opinions as of the date appearing on this material only. While we endeavor to update material on a reasonable basis the information discussed herein, there may be regulatory, compliance or other reasons that prevent us from doing so. Our officers, directors, and employees, including persons involved in the preparation or issuance of this material may from time to time, have long or short positions in, and may buy or sell the securities or the derivatives (including options) of companies mentioned herein.

Company Background
En Pointe Technologies (located in El Segundo, Calif.) is one of the leading providers of information technology products, and enterprise-wide, value-added professional services. Its state-of-the-art network provides its customers with multiple product sourcing, acquisition, and delivery. Essentially, the Company is a virtual clearinghouse, focusing on the high-end Fortune 500 companies as well as state and local governments.

The company was founded in 1993, and went public in May 1996 at a price per share of $8.00. At present, the company employs about 300 people, (150 in sales and inside sales support; 150 in professional services and support and administration. The company markets nationwide through 22 sales offices.

En Pointe created and greatly expanded upon the virtual inventory model, which allows the customer to view multiple billions of dollars of inventory from major distributors within highly flexible formats. Customers use the company's sophisticated on-line system to place orders for immediate delivery. In addition, the company provides software application development, Web site design and other contractual business development services.

Last year, En Pointe completed its first acquisition of an Internet-based, purchasing-point company -- "Firstsource." Revenues in this subsidiary have grown dramatically over the past several quarters, and we are projecting approximately $50 million by the end of its fiscal year.

With top-notch management, a strong professional service organization, and future plans to become a leading E-Commerce company, En Pointe will, in our opinion, evolve into one a new breed of hybrid, all-electronic resellers of information goods.

Viewpoint
Although its shares have recently declined due to the fact that its gross margins have been declining along with relatively flat revenue growth, the Company continues to exhibit strong underlying fundamentals. Our projections for Q3/99 (just completed) show that En Pointe should experience, we believe, significant margin and revenue growth. It has built up enormous distribution power over a very short period of time (growth rates far exceed industry averages -- see "Valuation" Table), while demonstrating success at response-time fulfillment and technical support. En Pointe has developed a global platform (based upon proprietary software) that electronically links networks of the largest distributors. Given continuing industry-wide pressure on gross margins, and in an industry with low single-digit net margins, this electronic "virtual" inventory model, in our opinion, will be the surviving industry paradigm.

Reasons to Invest
There are several major reasons to invest in the company's shares in addition to projected earnings improvement coincident with substantial revenue growth (especially in higher-than traditional business areas, such as E-Commerce, agency business, high-end professional services, and Internet shopping.

-- The strong possibility that the company will continue to take
active measures to reduce its overall expenses and reshape its
core business.

-- The likelihood that within the next 90 days the company will
spin-off and take public its Firstsource subsidiary at an
estimated market value of $200 to $300 million.

-- A major expansion of marketing, sales and strengthening of
Firstsource in the booming e-commerce market space. The company
has recently hired a new CEO -- Joe Cox (from Disney) and intends
to continue to build-up its management and operating
infrastructure.

-- The fact that its shares (not including its "Internet" value) are
trading at a substantial price-to-sales discount to its
comparable industry group
In conclusion, we would expect the company to continue to improve its core business as well as more actively move into the E-Commerce arena, perhaps with additional acquisitions. With a Firstsource IPO likely to occur in the near future, we strongly believe that investors should purchase its shares at current prices. Our six-month target price is $20.

Sector Comparison

30-Jun (ttm)
(ttm) MKT 2-Jul % Off PRICE/
COMPANY SYM Sales CAP Price High SALES

EN POINTE ENPT 617.8 35.6 6 1/2 (0.38) 0.06
ALPHANET ALPH 156.2 24.2 3 7/8 (0.66) 0.16
COMPUCOM CMPC 2,310 196.5 4 5/16 (0.39) 0.09
ELCOM ELCO 747.9 130.6 4 13/16 (0.46) 0.17
MANCHESTER MANC 217.6 23.3 3 (0.68) 0.11
POMEROY PMRY 627 163.5 14.125 (0.50) 0.25

(mrq) 3 yr 3 yr
COMPANY PRICE/ (ttm) (ttm) Rev EPS Shs Out
BOOK P/E EPS Grwth Grwth (mil)
EN POINTE 1.34 nm (0.63) 41.41 21.34 5.94
ALPHANET 0.57 nm (0.15) 32.34 (46.14) 6.25
COMPUCOM 1.02 53.91 (0.15) 16.07 nm 47.64
ELCOM 1.55 nm (1.04) 34.85 nm 27.67
MANCHESTER 0.61 15.37 0.04 5.84 (1.27) 8.20
POMEROY 1.38 7.84 1.78 39.62 33.15 11.73

EN POINTE TECHNOLOGIES
FISCAL YEAR END SEPT. 30

96 YR 97 YR

Net Sales 345,093 491,358
Cost of Sales 316,165 447,276

Gross Profit 28,928 44,082

Selling 15,253 22,339
General & Administrative 5,948 10,905
Non-recurring Expenses 525

Operating Expenses 21,726 33,244

Operating Income 7,202 10,838

Interest Income (expense) (1,673) (1,238)
Other Income (expense) 116 194

Non-operating Income (1,557) (1,045)

Pretax Income 5,645 9,793
Income Taxes 2,315 3,961

Net Income 3,330 5,831

EPS ($) Primary 0.788 0.99
Avg. Shs. Outs, Primary 4,225 5,890

Growth Rates YOY YOY

Net Sales 71.9% 42.4%
Gross Profits 80.4% 52.4%
Operating Income 142.2% 50.5%
Net Income 373.7% 75.1%
EPS ($) Primary 280.1% 25.6%

Profitability Ratios

Gross Margin 8.4% 4.8% 9.0% 7.0%
Operating Margin 2.1% 39.1% 2.2% 5.7%
Pretax Margin 1.6% 172.6% 2.0% 21.8%
Net Margin 1.0% 141.2% 1.2% 23.0%

Expense Ratios

Cost of Sales 91.6% 71.1% 91.0% -0.6%
Selling 4.4% 63.9% 4.5% 2.9%
General & Administrative 1.7% 58.4% 2.2% 28.8%
Operating Expenses 6.3% 70.8% 6.8% 7.5%
Tax Rate 41.0% 0.0% 40.4% -1.4%

Estimated
98 YR 1999 FY
Net Sales 567,739 662,459
Cost of Sales 514,168 608,770

Gross Profit 53,571 53,688

Selling 34,258 36,741
General & Administrative 13,665 15,449
Non-recurring Expenses 7,578

Operating Expenses 47,923 59,768

Operating Income 5,648 6,080

Interest Income (expense) (2,165) (3,860)
Other Income (expense) 237 4,595

Non-operating Income (1,928) 735

Pretax Income 3,720 (5,345)
Income Taxes 1,488 1,679

Net Income 2,232 (3,666)

EPS ($) Primary 0.37 (0.51)
Avg. Shs. Outs, Primary 5,875 5,935

Growth Rates YOY YOY

Net Sales 15.5% 16.7%
Gross Profits 21.5% 0.2%
Operating Income -47.9% 7.6%
Net Income -61.7% -264.2%
EPS ($) Primary -62.6% -237.8%

Profitability Ratios

Gross Margin 9.4% 5.2% 8.1% -14.1%
Operating Margin 1.0% -54.9% 0.9% -7.7%
Pretax Margin 0.7% -67.1% -0.8% -223.1%
Net Margin 0.4% -66.9% -0.6% -240.8%

Expense Ratios

Cost of Sales 90.6% -0.5% 91.9% 1.5%
Selling 6.0% 32.7% 5.5% -8.1%
General & Administrative 2.4% 8.5% 2.3% -3.1%
Operating Expenses 8.4% 24.8% 9.0% 6.9%
Tax Rate 40.0% -1.1% 0.3% -99.4%

EN POINTE TECHNOLOGIES
FISCAL YEAR END SEPT. 30

1998
1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q

Net Sales 130,189 135,303 143,811 158,436
Cost of Sales 116,798 122,510 130,258 144,602

Gross Profit 13,391 12,793 13,553 13,834
Selling 8,130 8,625 8,547 8,956

General &

Administrative 2,956 3,476 3,557 3,676

Non-recurring
Expenses

Operating Expenses 11,086 12,101 12,104 12,632
Operating Income 2,305 692 1,449 1,202

Interest Income

(expense) (427) (419) (298) (1,021)
Other Income (expense) 53 81 70 33

Pretax Income 1,931 354 1,221 214
Income Taxes 792 145 501 50

Net Income 1,139 209 720 164
EPS ($) Primary 0.18 0.04 0.12 0.03

Avg. Shs. Outs,

Primary 5,843 5,862 5,898 5,922

Growth Rates

Net Sales 16.6% 16.0% 12.0% 17.6%
Gross Profits 35.9% 33.0% 15.6% 7.4%
Operating Income -1.2% -72.4% -48.2% -62.5%
Net Income -4.0% -84.2% -50.8% -91.2%
EPS ($) Primary -14.3% -82.6% -52.0% -90.0%

Profitability Ratios

Gross Margin 10.3% 9.5% 9.4% 8.7%
Operating Margin 1.8% 0.5% 1.0% 0.8%
Pretax Margin 1.5% 0.3% 0.8% 0.1%
Net Margin 0.9% 0.2% 0.5% 0.1%

Expense Ratios

Cost of Sales 89.7% 90.5% 90.6% 91.3%
Selling 6.2% 6.4% 5.9% 5.7%

General &

Administrative 2.3% 2.6% 2.5% 2.3%
Operating Expenses 8.5% 8.9% 8.4% 8.0%
Tax Rate 0.6% 0.1% 0.3% 0.0%

1999E
1Q 2Q 3QE 4QE
Net Sales 170,607 144,918 165,207 181,727
Cost of Sales 157,225 133,878 151,660 166,008

Gross Profit 13,382 11,040 13,547 15,719
Selling 8,765 9,065 8,921 9,990

General &

Administrative 3,940 4,571 3,304 3,634

Non-recurring

Expenses 7,578

Operating Expenses 12,705 21,214 12,225 13,624
Operating Income 677 (10,174) 1,322 2,095

Interest Income

(expense) (855) (1,255) (850) (900)
Other Income (expense) 31 4,464 80 20

Pretax Income (147) (6,965) 552 1,215
Income Taxes 60 2,429 (244) (566)

Net Income (87) (4,536) 308 649
EPS ($) Primary 0.09 (0.76) .05(a) 0.11

Avg. Shs. Outs,

Primary 5,924 5,935 5,935 5,935

Growth Rates

Net Sales 26.1% 11.3% 14.9% 14.7%
Gross Profits 4.6% -17.6% 0.0% 13.6%
O 514,168 608,770

Gross Profit 53,571 53,688
Selling 34,258 36,741

General &

Administrative 13,665 15,449

Non-recurring

Expenses 7,578

Operating Expenses 47,923 59,768
Operating Income 5,648 (6,080)

Interest Income

(expense) (2,165) (3,860)
Other Income (expense) 237 4,595

Pretax Income 3,720 (5,345)
Income Taxes 1,488 1,679

Net Income 2,232 (3,666)
EPS ($) Primary 0.37 (0.56)

Avg. Shs. Outs,

Primary 5,875 5,935

Growth Rates

Net Sales 15.5% 16.7%
Gross Profits 21.5% 0.2%
Operating Income -48% -208%
Net Income -62% -264%
EPS ($) Primary -63% -252%

Profitability Ratios

Gross Margin 9.4% 8.1%
Operating Margin 1.0% -0.9%
Pretax Margin 0.7% -0.8%
Net Margin 0.4% -0.6%

Expense Ratios

Cost of Sales 90.6% 91.9%
Selling 6.0% 5.5%

General &

Administrative 2.4% 2.3%
Operating Expenses 8.4% 9.0%
Tax Rate 40.0% 0.3%

(a) Does not include loss associated with ongoing operations of Purchase Point.

Buy Price: $8 3/8
July 8, 1999

Copyright (C) 1999 Business Wire. All rights reserved.

CONTACT: En Pointe Technologies Inc. (ENPT)
Mark Bergman or Chris Djernaes, 800/545-3345
WEB PAGE: businesswire.com
GEOGRAPHY: CALIFORNIA
Today's News On The Net - Business Wire's full file on the Internet with Hyperlinks to your home page.

Copyright ¸ 1999, Business Wire, all rights reserved.

also see access1financial strong buy rating on en point

access1financial.com.