Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Piffer Thread on Political Rantings and Ravings -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jcky who wrote (4068)	11/12/2001 2:11:36 PM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 14610

We know that both engines, the fuselage, and at least one wing wound up in four different places. We know that one engine was essentially intact when it came off - that's the one that landed in the gas station lot, miraculously missing the pumps. We know that the other engine actually landed on a three story house, which causes me to doubt that it exploded - if it had, it would have fallen in pieces and the witnesses would not have been able to say that it was an engine that hit the house. We probably know that the explosion was near the junction of one wing and the fuselage - that's what the eyewitnesses say. Where's the luggage compartment on these planes?