SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : War -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Carolyn who wrote (8526)11/12/2001 3:43:51 PM
From: Machaon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 23908
 
<< Robert - there is no indication this was anything but an accident. Let's not jump to conclusions. >>

Dealing with probability. If it looks like a rat, if it smells like a rat, it usually is a rat.

Just like the Anthrax. Probability has it that it is the Islamic terrorists that are using the Anthrax weapon.

I realize that the U.S. does not want to create a public scared to fly, but the probability of a terrorist cause of the airplane crash is very high.



To: Carolyn who wrote (8526)11/12/2001 5:21:10 PM
From: Ben Wa  Respond to of 23908
 
I agree. It needn't have been a terrorist act. There may have been a temporary localized inversion of gravity waves.



To: Carolyn who wrote (8526)11/12/2001 8:35:35 PM
From: Ali Chen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 23908
 
"there is no indication this was anything but an accident. Let's not jump to conclusions."

So, nobody saw a little trace of smoke headed from a
parked van right into the hot spot of aircraft engine?
Is anyone looking into this scenario?