Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Islam, The Message -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sultan who wrote (200)	11/12/2001 4:47:15 PM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 758

These five "definitions" do not respond to the puzzling fact that being absolute (+almighty?) is not "feasible as per my example. It still comes down not to "evidence" but to faith. If you look at the planet earth, these four definitions apply to it as well (at least within the realm of human grasp), those thus make it "god", the same applies to the "sun", the moon and many other idolatrous deities of the past. I could write: Say: He is the Sun, the One and Only: (correct by definition, or "axiomatic") Sun, the Eternal, Absolute (correct within the space of homo sapiens species span on "eternal", and absolute, within the limitations of my prior post.) He Begetteth not, nor is He begotten (correct by definition for the Sun, but Christianity would quarrel with that as a godly prerequisite) And there is none like onto him (really a repetition of 1 above, and applies as well to the Sun.) Conclusion, the Sun is God, and here we are back 4000 years in the annals of humanity worshiping the sun, and obsequious, as ever to the powers of nature.. Zeev