Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: b-witch who wrote (10177)	11/13/2001 10:04:19 AM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

B-witch... I'm not "against" solar... especially passive solar. I'm just looking for a "reality check" by those who propose solar, or even wind, power.. as a complete replacement for, or primary generator of, the nation's power. It's just not efficacious to do so.... But on the other hand, a nuclear/hydrogen combination where modern and more safely designed nukes could produce power both for the nation power grid, but also supply the off-peak power needed to produce large quantities of hydrogen needed for fuel cells, should be a feasible scenario for superceding fossil fuels as the primary source of energy... Energy independence is a national security issue, which makes it topical to foreign affairs. But I still believe we should carry this conversation to other threads. Hawk