SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jlallen who wrote (202214)11/13/2001 11:20:10 AM
From: calgal  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
jewishworldreview.com



To: jlallen who wrote (202214)11/13/2001 11:36:00 AM
From: Jagfan  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
I thought the reply to that post was just as asinine.

To:Patricia C. Trinchero who wrote (1000)
From: Mephisto Tuesday, Nov 13, 2001 3:45 AM
Respond to of 1004

I believe the attitude of arrogance emanates from the entire Bush Administration. Rice wanted to pull
us out of NATO. O'Neill refused to look into offshore accounts where the rich and terrorists hide their
money, Cheney pulls off an energy policy but won't tell you who helped him put it together. Old
Ashcroft probably reads copies of the pro Klan magazine, "Southern Partisan" when no one is looking.
Don't forget that Bush snubbed the South Korean President, got into an argument with China and enraged the
world when he refused to sign the Kyoto Protocol and those are only a few issues.

Plus, Gail Norton sells American the Beautiful to drillers and coal miners slice by slice.

Most importantly, I read into today's paper that Bush and crowd wouldn't do anything about bin Laden
b4 September 11 because of: Saudi OIL.........

But you always knew it was about oil.........

They are all up to their dirty tricks. They wave the flag in front of you while they stab you in the
back with another flag's pole.

LOL, LOved the line about Bush not doing anything about Bin Laden.



To: jlallen who wrote (202214)11/13/2001 1:00:36 PM
From: Kenneth V. McNutt  Respond to of 769670
 
<<LOL!! Clinton was so "engaging". I'm sure ALL the interns thought so!!!>>
Pat jealous. Nah!
Ken(#1)