SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Crazy Fools Chasing Crazy CyberNews -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ms.smartest.person who wrote (725)11/13/2001 4:41:55 PM
From: ms.smartest.person  Respond to of 5140
 
BW/NEWS ANALYSIS: For Memory Chips, a Time to Forget
NOVEMBER 13, 2001

With too much capacity still on-line, the most popular chips are selling below cost. The upshot: Shakeout ahead

Semiconductor companies have all gotten whacked this year, but none harder than producers of memory chips. Prices of dynamic random-access memory (DRAM) chips, used to store data on personal computers, fell 80% in 2001, vs. a falloff of only about one-third for the overall chip market. With memory chips now often selling below cost, Boise (Idaho)-based Micron Technology, the only major U.S. memory-chip producer, recorded a net loss of $521 million for fiscal 2001 ended Aug. 30 -- a huge downturn, considering the company earned $1.55 billion the year before.

The bad news continues for the memory industry, which will account for about 20% of the $134 billion global semiconductor business this year. Memory prices will likely stay in their downward spiral well into 2002, analysts say. Blame slowing consumer and business spending -- and the recent government-backed bailout of South Korea's Hynix Semiconductor, the world's No. 3 memory maker, which ruined hopes that worldwide production would be cut (see BW, 10/1/01, "Hynix May Be Down to Its Last Chip").

In addition, startups in China are adding to the overproduction by continuing to ramp up output, flooding the market with cheap memory. Some chips have as much as a 30% oversupply, estimates Eric Rothdeutsch, analyst with investment bank Robertson Stephens.

HEMORRHAGING CASH. For DRAM makers, which represent the largest portion of the memory market, doing business is "like bleeding to death," says Jim Cantore, memory analyst with electronic components consultancy iSuppli. The more chips the companies sell, the more money they lose. One gigabit of DRAM, which retailed for $20 at the beginning of 2001, now sells for $1.50 -- and costs nearly $2 to produce. Prices of flash-memory chips, which are used to keep photos and digital music, and static random-access memory (SRAM), which is used in cell phones, networks, and computers, have fallen by as much as 50%, as well.

Why do companies keep selling at such a loss? It's that or pull out of the business. The next year will probably determine which companies can stay in the game and which can't. "Ultimately, somebody has got to run out of money," explains Cantore. The DRAM market will reach only $11 billion in 2001, according to consultants IC Insights, down 67% from 2000. And DRAM makers are already playing Survivor. In the semiconductor version of the popular TV show, it's about time to vote the extra players out of the market, analysts figure.

The major DRAM makers today include Micron, Samsung Semiconductor, Hynix, Infineon Technologies (IFX ), and Toshiba, among others. But only one or two of the majors are likely to remain in the market after next year, with the rest being gobbled up or pushed out of the business, predicted Bill McLean, president of IC Insights, at a Nov. 5 industry gathering in Portland, Ore. Most analysts believe that today's memory leaders Samsung Semiconductor and Micron will be the only ones to stay in this field.

RESHUFFLING THE PLAYERS. Already, Toshiba is said to be in talks to sell its DRAM operation to Infineon. Hynix, revived for now by a fresh infusion of cash from a Korean bank closely associated with the Korean government, could fold within a year unless the company gets more funds, believes Charles Boucher, analyst with investment bank Bear Stearns. To the contrary, says a Hynix spokesperson: "It will be someone else who drops out."

Micron and Samsung will likely gain a few percentage points in DRAM market share, believes Brian Matas, analyst at IC Insights. In the more stable flash-memory market, dominated by Intel (INTC ), STMicroelectronics (STM ) is gaining market share, says Rothdeutsch.

The next year could bring about a major market-share reshuffle. And these changes will be as good as permanent if the market recovers in the fourth quarter of 2002, as analysts predict. The introduction of new cell phones and the spread of Microsoft's new operating system, Windows XP, in the first half of 2002 will kick off another wave of demand for memory, says Matas. And those companies that stay in the game will benefit from the extra revenues when the good times roll, says Matas. Displacing them will be hard, as these memory makers would have the resources and the customers to push smaller entrants out of the way.

HIKING OUTPUT. The long-suffering DRAM market will likely recover before other chip sectors, believes Cantore. Flash and SRAM will follow, though SRAM will remain flat through 2005, as companies often replace it with less expensive, alternative technologies, says Steve Cullen, analyst with the tech consulting firm IDC. Flash memory, though sales won't double each year as they did earlier, will show the fastest growth in the years to come, he says.

Little surprise, then, that many memory makers are increasing production of flash chips. Samsung, for instance, will increase its production of certain types of flash memory by as much as 150% next year, says Dieter Mackowiak, the company's senior vice-president for sales and marketing.

For now, however, other indications of an impending turnaround are scarce. Sales of PCs, which consume 85% of DRAM memory chips, have been falling. Worldwide PC shipments dropped 13.7% in the third quarter of 2001 vs. that period last year, according to IDC. Moreover, "the amount of memory required for applications hasn't risen," says Cantore. "We've reached the plateau where getting more memory is not going to change the performance of the machine." And cash-strapped telecom companies, big users of SRAM chips, are projected to spend even less next year than in horrible 2001.

OVERPRICED? "We don't see that the business is going to recover in the next 12 months," says Samsung's Mackowiak. Analysts are more optimistic, but they recommend caution when it comes to investing in these companies. "The memory companies are stuck in the worst downturn in their history," says Boucher of Bear Stearns. "The stocks don't [yet] reflect that."

He believes that, even now, most memory stocks trade at a 50% to 100% premium. Thus, Micron, trading around $24.50, should be trading below $16, he contends. With that kind of pessimism, the deep troubles in the memory-chip market don't appear to be anywhere near over.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

By Olga Kharif in Portland, Ore.
Edited by Thane Peterson


Copyright 2000-2001, by The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use Privacy Policy
businessweek.com
Used with permission of businessweek.com



To: ms.smartest.person who wrote (725)11/13/2001 5:08:15 PM
From: ms.smartest.person  Respond to of 5140
 
BW/INVESTING Q&A: A Growth Fund Just for Kids
NOVEMBER 13, 2001

Managing the Stein Roe Young Investors Fund is more than child's play for David Brady, who is fostering a new generation of investors

Long-term growth -- really long-term -- is the aim of the Stein Roe Young Investors Fund. And the large-cap growth stocks it stresses are already snapping back, says David P. Brady, portfolio manager of the Young Investors Fund and several other Stein Roe funds.

Brady aims to teach youngsters about money and investing by getting them started in stocks, often with the help of parents and grandparents. Recently, the fund has provided a bitter lesson in market volatility, since large-cap growth has been the market sector hardest hit. However, the fund has outperformed other large-cap growth funds, Brady says.

For his target market, Brady avoids tobacco and alcohol stocks and tries to choose names young people can identify with. Thus his favorites include Microsoft and entertainment giant Viacom. The fund has also done well, he reports, with stocks such as Citigroup, Household International, Johnson & Johnson, and American Home Products.

Brady made these comments in a chat presented Nov. 8 by BusinessWeek Online on America Online, in response to questions from the audience and from Jack Dierdorff of BW Online and Margaret Popper of the BusinessWeek economics staff. Edited excerpts from this chat follow. A full transcript is available from BusinessWeek Online on AOL at keyword: BW Talk.

Q: Dave, the stock market has been moving in fits and starts, or so it sometimes seems. What's your analysis of the current macro outlook?
A:
I am optimistic over the course of the next 12 months. Interest rates are low and are expected to remain low, as inflation is under control. We have had one round of fiscal stimulus from our government, and I expect another sometime before the end of the year. Another plus for the economy is lower oil and gasoline prices. Finally, there is a lot of liquidity in the system. Hundreds of billions of dollars were poured into money-market mutual funds, and I see that as being a potential source of investment capital....

The wild card will be the consumer. If the consumer spends in 2002, I project economic growth to be in the 2%-to-3% range. Most of that growth will come in the second half of the year. That implies growth in the second half of the year will be at a 4%-to-5% annual rate.

Q: But isn't the real problem with this economy a lack of corporate spending? With capacity utilization so low, why would companies start investing?
A:
That has been the problem up until probably midyear. There is no doubt industrial America was in a recession for approximately 12 to 18 months prior to the middle of this year. What is different now is inventories are under control -- in other words, the economy is no longer liquidating inventory. Corporate spending tends to be cyclical. Therefore, I believe we will see an increase in corporate spending in 2002, off 2001's very low levels.

Q: Dave, over to your funds -- what's the target market for the Stein Roe Young Investors Fund?
A:
The fund's target market is parents, grandparents, and well-meaning aunts and uncles who want to start young people on a long-term investment program while at the same time educating them on money and investing.

Q: So its emphasis is on growth stocks? What have some of your winners been?
A:
I look for companies that can grow sales and increase their earning power over the long term. The increase in earnings over the long term is important because I feel stock prices will follow growth and earnings per share. I look for companies that are well managed, have a strategic competitive advantage, and are solidly financed. Recent winners include many of the holdings in the financial services sector, such as Household International (HI ) and Citigroup (C ). Other long-term winners include Microsoft (MSFT ), Johnson & Johnson (JNJ ), and American Home Products (AHP ). Each one of those names has been in the fund for at least three and a half years.

Q: How do your picks for Young Investors differ from those for a regular equity growth fund?
A:
They differ in a couple of ways. First, I like to put companies in the portfolio that affect a child's life in a positive way. Therefore, you won't see an alcohol or tobacco company in the fund. If a child can see a name in a portfolio and instantly recognize the name, or if I can put a name in a portfolio and explain to the child what that company does to make money, those are fun things that can hook children and keep them interested in investing.

Q: How do your shareholders learn about the market -- just from following the fund?
A:
Well, the primary educational tool is the quarterly newsletter we send out. It's called the Dollar Digest. It's a colorful, easy-to-read letter that talks about investment topics of interest. We also talk about companies we own in the fund, and we try to explain what they do and why we feel they're good investments. Occasionally, we will conduct CEO interviews, where our investors may ask CEOs questions. We've done interviews with Michael Quinlin of McDonald's and Bill Gates of Microsoft (to name two).

Q: Young Investors has had a wild ride -- up, then down. How do you explain to a new investor if they got in at the top?
A:
Well, stay patient. The fund is definitely slanted toward large-cap growth stocks, and large-growth has been the worst part of the market over the last year. Positively, the Young Investor fund has outperformed most large-cap-growth mutual funds. In addition, this is a good lesson for our shareholders: Stocks are volatile -- they don't always go straight up.... Since September, the fund has outperformed the market.

Q: When do you see large-cap growth coming back?
A:
Well, it already is. Many large-growth names are found in the Nasdaq composite index, and I believe since the end of September, the Nasdaq is up close to 22%. Since its Sept. 21 low, I believe it's up closer to 30%. So the move in large growth has started.

Q: What are your shareholder meetings like? Are 11-year-olds tough?
A:
They're tough but understanding. I have received a number of letters from my shareholders over the years, and some of the best letters include stock recommendations. In the past, I've been given interesting "buy" ideas. I've also been berated for some of the names I've held in the portfolio. One shareholder told me one of the restaurant names we had was no longer cool, and no one went there. She couldn't understand why it was still held in the fund.

Q: Are there some good growth stocks to get into now?
A:
If you're thinking about getting into the market, I think this is a good time to be patient and pick your stocks. There are a number of names that are in the fund that I favor. These include Microsoft. I like the product cycle they're just rolling out, a new operating system. They also have the X-box. And finally, I think their dot-net strategy could become significant. Outside of tech, I like Viacom (VIA.B ). Viacom is an entertainment company; some of its operations include the CBS network, MTV, and Infinity radio stations.... Viacom's business is heavily leveraged toward advertising. I think, as the economy picks up, so will ad spending. This will be a big positive for Viacom's business, the company's earnings, and its stock.

Q: Which three sectors will be the best performers over the next three to six months?
A:
That is very difficult to say, and normally I'm not involved in making predictions over that short a period of time.... That said, if the economy does recover, as I'm expecting, I think that cyclical names could do very well. The basic materials sector, the consumer cyclicals, and finally tech. If the economy expands and IT budgets grow, I would expect technology to do well in '02. I want to caution you, however...I think technology is a good investment, but not the "sure thing" it was back in the late 1990s.

Q: What have your funds been buying recently?
A:
I've been buying names that are leveraged to growth in the economy. I really do believe that GDP will bottom in the fourth quarter and begin to accelerate throughout '02. That doesn't mean the first quarter of '02 won't have negative growth.

I like names like Alcoa (AA ), the leading low-cost supplier of aluminum. Viacom I have bought recently. On the more conservative side, I just bought some BellSouth (BLS ). I think there is a good probability we will see more deregulation in the telecom space and more consolidation. I think BellSouth could be a real beneficiary over the next year or so. Finally, for investors willing to take a little more risk, I have recently added Southwest Airlines (LUV ) to the portfolio. I like the management and the growth prospects, but we really do need to see consumers traveling in '02 for this stock to really work.

Q: Aren't telecoms and the airlines suffering from overcapacity?
A:
The airlines have recently cut capacity. Southwest is no doubt affected by that, but I think there are a number of other factors that outweigh it. As I said, I think this is a very well-run company with good growth prospects. In the telecom space, there is no doubt we've seen an overbuild in telecom infrastructure. That doesn't really affect BellSouth in a negative way.

Q: Here's a question people love to ask: If you could buy one stock and only one right now, what would it be?
A:
That is a very difficult question, and it really does depend on your tolerance for risk and your objective. If you're willing to assume a lot of risk, take a look at Network Appliance (NTAP ) or Rational Software (RATL ). If you want to assume a moderate amount of risk, look at Calpine (CPN ). And finally, lower-risk (but remember, low risk for a stock means you could still lose money) is Microsoft. My time horizon for all of these investments is at least 12 months.

Q: Any final words of wisdom for us, Dave? We have a factor of uncertainty in our world now we haven't faced before.
A:
Diversify, and don't be afraid to invest long-term.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Edited by Jack Dierdorff


Copyright 2000-2001, by The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use Privacy Policy

businessweek.com:/print/investor/content/nov2001/pi20011113_8564.htm?mainwindow
Used with permission of businessweek.com