Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ali Chen who wrote (79762)	11/14/2001 7:26:45 AM
From: Dave	Respond to of 93625

Ali, We are talking about separate "things". During a patent infringement suit, the alledged infringer makes two arguments. The first argument is, "We are not infringing upon Patent X". The second argument is, "While we are not infringing upon the patent, patent X is not valid" Remember, Infineon never attempted to invalidate those patents. It may be for good. The decision could help to differentiate "quality IP" against "imitation IP". Ali, for once, we might agree. But, then, I assume, its up to the court to decide who has quality and who has quantity?