Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: smolejv@gmx.net who wrote (11107)	11/13/2001 11:34:10 PM
From: pezz	Respond to of 74559

>How could one "create" jobs when productivity is less manpower for a given output? < Less manpower per output means more output not less manpower.................no? No loss of jobs here...Just newly created wealth which initself is economic stimulative thus more jobs ........seems to me... whatever, historical evidence would seem to back up the concept that productivity = jobs.........Just my tooo cents.

To: smolejv@gmx.net who wrote (11107)	11/14/2001 9:37:41 AM
From: AC Flyer	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 74559

>>Marx could give an answer or two, or at least hints, on this subject<< It seems to me that Marx's approach to job and wealth creation has been tried already. As I recall, it didn't work out too well. >>For me it boils down to the questions of "who owns the productive means" and "how the newly created wealth is distributed".<< Are you sure you're in the right place? Wouldn't you feel more comfortable here: wsws.org or here: cpusa.org