SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Charles Gryba who wrote (148195)11/14/2001 5:34:29 PM
From: wanna_bmw  Respond to of 186894
 
Constantine, you don't just turn up the dial, and expect these machines to do one step better. The rest of your manufacturing process needs to be pure and efficient enough to deal with the even smaller dimensions. The rest of the industry considers .10u to be the next manufacturing node, and all the standardized design rules apply to this measurement. Intel obviously thought they could do one better, so they refined their .10u process to be able to produce .09u. As usual, AMD aims to play "Me Too", just so that they cannot be considered as falling behind. If their process is not ready for smaller dimensions, they stand the risk of having significantly worse yields, just so that they can have the same process as Intel.

I'm not saying this is all for certain, but it's my impression right now.

wbmw



To: Charles Gryba who wrote (148195)11/14/2001 6:27:01 PM
From: fingolfen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Wanna, is the 193nm equipment good enough fro .09? If yes, why even bother with .10? ( the same question goes for intel )

Constantine,

Process nomenclature has recently changed. What used to be called the "0.10 micron node" is now officially called the "90nm node" though some people call it the "0.09 micron node."