SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : XYBR - Xybernaut -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: blebovits who wrote (4651)11/14/2001 9:24:58 PM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6847
 
I wonder how little(ASAP)Christina missed "fugitive, Michael H Horne from the Scorpion criminal indictment." in her research when she highly recommended the purchase of Accesspoint Corporation.

Title: Accesspoint Corporation Announces Investment Opinion

Summary: ANAHEIM, Calif., Aug 3, 1999 (BUSINESS WIRE via COMTEX) --; CSK Securities Releases "Buy Rating" on Accesspoint Corporation; "We are recommending the purchase of ASAP (Accesspoint). This is; an opportune time to become an early stage investor in the Internet; services industry sector and benefit from the tremendous; upside potential of this industry,"; said Christina S. Kohlhaas, CSK Securities Research
------------------------------------------------------------

In the TBXR filing Michael H. Horne does not appear. They slipped up in the Accesspoint Corp fling where the auditor did give the name. This is how Michael H. Horne is connected to TBXR through Citizen Asia Pacific Limited. He is mentioned in the MOB story below. The story says : "Today, Horne is a fugitive from the Scorpion criminal indictment"

Accesspoint Corp/NV · 10KSB · For 12/31/0 · EX-10.15

PURCHASER
Citizen Asia Pacific Limited

By: /s/ MICHAEL H. HORNE
--------------------------------------
Michael H. Horne,
Authorized Signatory


TBX RESOURCES INC filed this 10QSB on 07/20/2001

The Company expects that the principal source of funds in the near
future will be from the sale of its common stock. On February 6, 2001 the
Company entered into a Regulation S Stock Purchase agreement with Citizen AsiaPacific Limited (CAPL), a Hong Kong company.
============================================

J S J CAPITAL III INC ,ACCESSPOINT CORP /NV/ filed this 10KSB on 04/16/2001.

On December 21, 2000 we sold 18,805 shares of common voting stock to
Citizen Asia Pacific Limited.
.
====================================================

TBX RESOURCES INC filed this 10KSB on 02/28/2001.
Regulation S Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 30,
2001between TBX Resources Inc., a Texas corporation having offices at 12300 Ford
Road, Suite 194, Dallas, Texas 75234 (the "Company"), and Citizen Asia Pacific
Limited, a Hong Kong company having offices at 13/F Silver Fortune Plaza, 1
Wellington Street, Central, Hong Kong (the "Purchaser")
.
=====================================

Scorpion's outside auditors from Grant Thornton once sent an assistant to visit those Hong Kong distributors, according to the depositions of Grant Thornton partners. But at the supposed address of the software firms, the auditors instead found a personnel agency owned by Michael Horne, whom Eric Brown identifies in his deposition as a "puppet" of Marsh and a Scorpion lawyer named Jack T. Dawson. The SEC has charged that the Hong Kong firms funded their $1.2 million in cashier's checks not from distribution of Scorpion software but from distribution of Scorpion stock by Horne and a sidekick. Brokerage records, included as evidence in the Scorpion shareholder suit, support that allegation. Today, Horne is a fugitive from the Scorpion criminal indictment.

Monday, August 25, 1997
Buyer, Beware!
Dizzying deals raise questions about California's fast-growing Osicom Technologies

By Bill Alpert

Behind the Veil of Secrecy



To: blebovits who wrote (4651)11/14/2001 10:20:53 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 6847
 
MORE INFO ABOUT REGIS POSSINO AND PATTISON HAYTON WHO CONTROLLED THE HARTCOURT COMPANIES AND HIS TIES TO FIRST CAPITAL NETWORK INC. ACCORDING TO THIS STORY PATTISON HAYTONS INVESTMENT BANKER WAS FIRST CAPITAL NETWORK WHICH WAS CONTROLLED BY STOCK SWINDLERS RAMON D'ONOFRIO AND FELLOW SWINDLER REGIS POSSINO. PATTISON HAYTON JOINS A LONG LINE OF FRAUDULENT PROMOTERS CONNECTED TO REGIS POSSINO. PATTISON HAYTON RECENTLY WAS CHARGED BY THE SEC FOR SECURITIES FRAUD IS YOU DO A SEARCH AT THE SEC WEB SITE YOU WILL FIND THAT MARK D'ONOFRIO WAS RECENTY CHARED ON ANOTHER STOCK FRAUD AS WELL. sec.gov
=======================================================

sec.gov
Tradamax Group, Inc., Pattinson Hayton and Conrad Diaz: Lit. Rel. No. 17046 / June 21, 2001 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. TRADAMAX GROUP, INC., PATTINSON HAYTON, AND CONRAD DIAZ, Civ. ...
=========================================

Investor With Checkered Past Controls Two Public Firms

By John R. Emshwiller
Staff Reporter of The Wall Street Journal

10/13/1994
The Wall Street Journal

An Australian investor with a checkered past takes control of two public
companies and trading volume soars in both stocks. Should that be a reason
for elation or concern on the part of other holders?
In the case of little Quadrax Corp., a Portsmouth, R.I., supplier of
composite materials, and Apogee Robotics Inc., a Fort Collins, Colo., maker
of computerized materials-handling systems, the answer for now seems to
favor caution.

The investor is Pattinson Hayton, a 44-year-old who hails from Orroroo,
South Australia, and sometimes adds "Jr." or "III" to his name. Despite a
history of legal and financial troubles, Mr. Hayton this year became
chairman and, through his investment firm, a major shareholder of both
companies.
The ease with which he did it is a reminder that a public stock listing and
Securities and Exchange Commission disclosure rules still give investors no
magical protection. That's particularly true for tiny stocks like these two,
which trade in the Nasdaq Small Cap realm.

Mr. Hayton has been an executive or major holder of small public companies
before. In one such case he was sued by the SEC, eventually cited for
contempt and fined $60,000 by a federal judge in Washington, D.C., for
failing to file required documents. But because all of this occurred more
than five years ago, it doesn't have to be disclosed under SEC rules. More
recently, in California, state banking authorities have issued a written
order questioning Mr. Hayton's integrity.

In general, stock-related misdeeds are still "much more prevalent at smaller
companies than larger ones," says Stuart Allen in Washington, D.C., a former
senior SEC investigator. Tiny stocks' prices are often easy to manipulate
because of the relatively thin trading, says Mr. Allen, now a senior
associate with the financial-investigations firm of Lindquist, Avey,
Mcdonald, Baskerville Inc.

Mr. Hayton declined to be interviewed. His lawyer, Timothy MacDonald, did
accept detailed written questions and replied with a brief statement saying
"the questions posed aren't accurate representations" of Mr. Hayton or his
investment firm, Conagher & Co. Mr. Hayton's defenders say he's a
respectable businessman who is simply interested in financing promising new
technologies.

According to Quadrax and a July SEC filing by Conagher, Conagher invested
about $3 million (plus some Conagher preferred stock) for a stake of about
29% in Quadrax. Quadrax had reason to welcome the money. Its $5.7 million
loss for 1993 greatly exceeded revenue of $1.6 million.

An August SEC filing by Apogee says that Conagher obtained about a third of
Apogee's roughly 18 million shares in a swap for some Conagher preferred
that Conagher was supposed to repurchase over time for $2 million. The
filing also said that Conagher planned to sell about five million of its
Apogee shares to "certain third parties." Apogee had a loss of $1.1 million
in the nine months through March 31, on revenue of $853,000. The company
hasn't yet reported its fiscal 1994 full-year results.

Since Mr. Hayton entered the picture, both stocks' volume has surged, as the
charts indicate (See related illustrations -- WSJ Oct. 13, 1994). But
shareholders haven't made a killing in either stock. Quadrax ended at
$3.9375, up 18.75 cents on Nasdaq Stock Market volume of 210,200 yesterday.
Apogee closed at 21.875 cents, off 1.5625 cents on volume of 129,400.

Mr. Hayton nearly bought control earlier this year of a third public
company, Out-Takes Inc. of Santa Monica, Calif. But after reaching a
tentative accord, OutTakes backed off.

"It was not the right transaction for us," says its president, Robert
Shelton; other financing was arranged. He adds that Mr. Hayton's investment
banker in the Out-Takes negotiations was First Capital Network Inc. of Santa
Monica and one of its officials, Mark D'Onofrio.

According to SEC records, Mark D'Onofrio's father and longtime business
associate Ramon has been convicted four times for criminal violations of
securities laws, enjoined from further violations more than a half-dozen
times in civil actions and in 1975 was described by a federal appeals court
in New York as "ubiquitously criminal." The son, Mark D'Onofrio, has been
the subject of three SEC enforcement actions. Just last month, according to
the SEC, he and his father agreed to a permanent injunction barring them
from promoting stock for any broker or stock issuer, settling the SEC
stock-manipulation case in federal court in New York by agreeing to pay
$940,000 in penalties.

At the D'Onofrios' office, a woman who answered the phone said that the
D'Onofrios were unavailable.

In 1983, First American Bank in Nashville obtained a $1 million default
judgment against Mr. Hayton in connection with a note he had guaranteed.
That judgment remains largely unpaid, according to a lawyer for the bank.

In 1988, the SEC filed a suit in a Washington, D.C., federal court against
Mr. Hayton charging that firms he controlled had failed to file required
disclosure documents. Mr. Hayton later was found in contempt and fined
$60,000 for failing to comply with a court order that the documents be
filed.

Two years ago, Mr. Hayton was in the public markets again through his
controlling interest in Rally Ventures Ltd., a Santa Monica company that
raised money from the public to invest in other companies. In early 1992,
Rally made a $5 million debt offering in connection with its effort to buy a
unit of the Bank of Beverly Hills that administered more than $500 million
in retirement accounts. That purchase was blocked by the California
Superintendent of Banks.

In a written order, the state official said Rally's "financial condition is
uncertain," pointing to the "unsubstantiated" value of the firm's assets,
including notes supplied by another Hayton company. The superintendent added
that Mr. Hayton's "integrity . . . is subject to question." And it said that
in 1991, the federal Immigration and Naturalization Service issued a
deportation warrant for Mr. Hayton, who failed to report for deportation.
(INS officials say they won't comment on the case, as such records are
confidential.)

The Rally Ventures debt offering is the subject of a lawsuit filed earlier
this year in a Madison, Wis., state court. Unhappy investors claim they were
falsely told the debentures were a "no-risk" investment, adding that their
money was improperly taken out of a trust account created to hold their
funds. The suit seeks a refund plus interest and damages.

Mr. Hayton isn't named as a defendant, although the suit alleges he helped
put together a prospectus that contained "intentional misrepresentations."

Roggensack says she didn't name Mr. Hayton as a defendant because she
thought it would be difficult to collect from him in the event of a
judgment: "He is supposedly very difficult to pin down."



To: blebovits who wrote (4651)11/14/2001 10:25:30 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 6847
 
REGIS POSSINO TEAMED UP WITH ALAN PHAN PHD=
"PHONY HARTCOURT DOCTER"

Alan Phan of Hartcourt companies fake PHD. One of Regis Possino's first scam frauds was Hartcourt. I have it all documented mind you. Now Regis had to see to it that Alan Phan the front of the stock rig had a good title. They needed an important title for his resume like "Doctor" so this is the TRUTH ABOUT HIS DEGREE.

"Sussex College of Technology, Sussex, England. Perhaps the oldest of
Britian's degree mills, Sussex is run by "Dr." Bruce Copen from his
home, south of London. At the same address, but with different
catalogs are the Brantridge Forest School and the University of the
Science of Man. Each offer "earned" degrees for which a few
correspondence are required, and "extension awards" which are the same
degrees and diplomas for no work at all. Honorary Doctorates are
offered free, but there is a $100 engraving charge. "Professor
Emeritas"[sic] status costs another $100. One flyer admits Sussex
is not "accrediated" [sic] but goes on to say that "No student who
has taken our courses and awards have to date had problems." This
statement would not be accepted by, among many others, a former
high-level state official in Colorado who lost his job when the
source of his Doctorate was discovered

So, let’s see. According to SEC filings from the many companies Alan Phan has been involved with, his doctorate in management came from Penn State, or was that a Ph.D. in Environmental Science from Sussex College of Technology?
Make sure you go to this link . LOL copenlabs.com

And was that B.S. (what appropriate letters!) from Penn State or Sussex?

And how long has he been leading HRCT? Since 1990? Or 1994?

THE HARTCOURT COMPANIES (HRCT) SEC 10-KSB filing for 1996:

“Dr. Phan received his academic training and degrees at Pennsylvania State University (1967), and Sussex College of Technology, Sussex England (1975).”

AMG VENTURE SERVICES INC (AVSI), SEC 10SB12B filing dated May 6, 1999

“Alan V. Phan received his academic training and degrees at Pennsylvania State University (PhD-Management), his Master of Science degree from Sussex College of Technology and his Bachelor of Science in Environmental Engineering at Pennsylvania State University and has had over 30 years of experience in business management. Dr. Phan is currently Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of The Hartcourt Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ-OTB-BB) and its predecessor private company functioning in this capacity since 1994.”

AMERICAN VENTURE GROUP INC. (AVGI). SEC 10SB12B filing dated May 27, 1999

“Alan V. Phan received his academic training and degrees at Pennsylvania State University (PhD-Management), his Master of Science degree from Sussex College of Technology, and his Bachelor of Science in Environmental Engineering
at Pennsylvania State University and has had over 30 years of experience in business management. Dr. Phan is currently Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of The Hartcourt Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ-OTB-BB) and its predecessor private company functioning in this capacity since 1994.”

APOLLO VENTURE GROUP INC (AVGI) SEC 10SB12B filing dated June 1, 1999

“Alan V. Phan received his academic training and degrees at Pennsylvania State University (PhD-Management), his Master of Science degree from Sussex College of Technology, and his Bachelor of Science in Environmental Engineering
at Pennsylvania State University and has had over 30 years of experience in business management. Dr. Phan is currently Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of The Hartcourt Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ-OTB-BB) and its predecessor private company functioning in this capacity since 1994.”

THE HARTCOURT COMPANIES (HRCT) SEC SB-2 filing dated Aug. 24, 2000:

“Dr. Phan received his B.Sc. in Environmental Engineering from Pennsylvania State University, and his M.S. and Ph.D. from Sussex College of Technology in England.”

ENOVA HOLDINGS INC (EHI), SEC 10SB12B/A filing dated Oct 18, 2000

Dr. Alan V. Phan, Chairman of the Board and Director. Dr. Phan has over 30 years of experience in business management. He obtained his academic training and degrees at Pennsylvania State University and Sussex College of Technology. As Executive Vice President of Em Kay Group and Eisenberg Company, he established 11 industrial projects including real estate developments in Asia and South America. Dr. Phan has been a founder and Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Hartcourt since August 1990.

In a shareholder letter dated Aug. 31, 2000, Alan Phan said:

“In 1970, Sussex College of Technology and the University of Saigon started a joint post-graduate program in Management. It took me six years to complete and I am proud of my achievement…In any case, this subject of which University my doctoral degree is from has nothing to do with our company’s achievements or the future of our company.”

Indeed!

====================================================
More on Sussex College of Technology

From huffman Wed Apr 22 09:19:43 1998Subject: Here's my understanding
To: rotbard@ix.netcom.comDate: Wed, 22 Apr 1998 09:19:43 -0700 (PDT)
Dear Mr. Eric Rotbard,
If/When it was clear to both of us that Derek didn't earn a PhD
at a bona fide school, my assumption has been that these negotiations
would likely go into a mode where you would just ignore/stall. It
appears that is now the case. So, there were a couple of loose
ends I'd like to try to clean up. First, list all the diploma mills
in Bear's book. Secondly, a note that may be of personal interest
to you and a preview copy of an update to my web page.
I collected the list of PhD scam diploma mills from Bear's book
that I mentioned to you previously. These are from his chapter 25
that I also mentioned in the same previous post. Here's some
detail Dr. Bear gives for one diploma mill, as an example.
"Sussex College of Technology, Sussex, England. Perhaps the oldest of
Britian's degree mills, Sussex is run by "Dr." Bruce Copen from his
home, south of London. At the same address, but with different
catalogs are the Brantridge Forest School and the University of the
Science of Man. Each offer "earned" degrees for which a few
correspondence are required, and "extension awards" which are the same
degrees and diplomas for no work at all. Honorary Doctorates are
offered free, but there is a $100 engraving charge. "Professor
Emeritas"[sic] status costs another $100. One flyer admits Sussex
is not "accrediated" [sic] but goes on to say that "No student who
has taken our courses and awards have to date had problems." This
statement would not be accepted by, among many others, a former
high-level state official in Colorado who lost his job when the
source of his Doctorate was discovered. Sussex continues to advertise
extensively in newspapers and magazines in the U.S. and worldwide.
In 1988, a new British law came into effect, forbidding such "schools"
to accept students who enrolled after May 1st. Sussex's solution to
this minor annoyance was to offer to back-date all applications to
April 30th, 1988 - a creative response that British law apparantly
hasn't caught up with yet."
The following list is not claimed to be complete. The nature of this
type scam would make that almost impossible. Also, it is apparantly
very common for the con artists to slightly change the name of their
"school" from time to time. They also sometimes like to try to pick
names that are very close to accredited schools. I assume that
Derek's PhD was purchased from one of these "schools", if so then,
his PhD is a fraud and in that case I wouldn't really expect to hear
from you again.List of Chapter 25 Diploma Mills that appear to be in England.
Academy College of Holy StudiesAcademy of the Science of Man
Albany Educational ServicesAvatar Episcopal University
Avatar International UniversityBrantridge Forest School
British College of Soma-TherapyBritish Collegiate InstituteBroadhurst University
California Institute of Higher LearningCentral School of Religion
City Medical Correspondence CollegeCollege of Applied Science London
College of Divine MetaphysicsCollege of Spiritual Sciences
Collegium Technologicum Sussexensis Britannia
Creative University of Southeast LondonCromwell University
Ecclesiastical University of SheffieldEpiscopal University of London
European College of Science and ManFaraday CollegeGordon Arlen College
Harley UniversityInter-State CollegeInternational Protestant Birkbest College
London College of PhysiologyLondon College of TheologyLondon Educational College
London Institute for Applied ResearchLondon School for Social Research
London Tottenham International Christian UniversityLyne College
Metropolitan CollegiateMinisterial Training CollegeMorton-Colwyn University
National Ecclesiastical UniversityNational University of Sheffield
Nebraska College of Physical MedicineNewcastle University
Northwest London UniversityObura UniversityOxford College of Applied Science
Oxford Institute for Applied ResearchSaint John Chrysostom College
School of Applied SciencesSchool of Psychology and PsychotherapyShield College
South Eastern Extension CollegeSouthern Eastern University
Sussex College of TechnologyTrinity Collegiate Institute
United Free University of EnglandUniversal Ecclesiastical University
Universitas IltiensisUniversitates SheffieldensisUniversity of London
University of CoventryUniversity of EnglandUniversity of England at Oxford
University of SheffieldUniversity of Sulgrave
University of the Old Catholic ChurchUniversity of the Science of Man
University of WinchesterWest London College of Technology
Western Orthodox UniversityWhitby Hall CollegeWordsworth Memorial University
..............................................................
I was planning on updating my web page. Here is a preview copy
that you may review. I would, of course, be very interested in any
thing in here that you believe to be false or misleading. If you
let me know I will, of course, correct it. What may be of personal
interest to you is copies of our correspondence that I plan on
making available as "BACKGROUND INFORMATION". Unless I hear
differently from you, my plan is to censore out the phone number
of your law firm, okay? I don't plan on censoring out your email
address, okay? Based on postings to the news groups from you that
I read, I assume that this is the way you want it.
..............................................................
Ph.D. Frauds

(last modified 4/22/98)
Derek Smart, author of a mediocre computer game called Battlecruiser
3000ad (BC3K), is widely known on Usenet as being the focus of the
largest and longest running flame-fest ever seen, this occurs primarily
in the comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic (c.s.i.p.g.s.) news group.
INTRODUCTION
Derek Smart has claimed to have a PhD in almost every post he's made
over the past few years. Prior to the PhD wars (8/8/97 - present),
whenever anyone had asked about details he was strangely silent. The
biggest braggart many have ever seen being silent on such occasions
seemed very "out of character". This coupled with my observation of many
months of Derek lies, lead me to suspect that Derek's PhD was a fake.
After gathering further evidence, it's believed this is now an
inescapable conclusion.
Here's some things Derek has said about his studies. He has said that he
studied only part time. He's said that he studied in the USA and England.
He's said that it was a mail order college. He's more recently said his
school is in England. He's stated it wasn't important whether his school
was accredited or not. He's said it's a renowned accredited college. He's
said it's a small tech institute. He's said he grew up in England and
moved to the USA in 1989.SUMMARY
This presentation argues that Derek's PhD is a fraud. It consists of
four firmly established facts. These facts taken together, show that his
PhD is a probable fraud. Derek has not earned a PhD at any accredited
university.FACT 1: Derek Smart's PhD dissertation is not listed anywhere.
(Almost all PhD dissertations are listed in DAI or somewhere.)
FACT 2: Derek has not provided simple information.
(Derek hasn't named his alma mater, among other things.)
FACT 3: Derek Smart has changed the story about his PhD.
(He said his dissertation was published now, he says it's not.)
FACT 4:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 1998 19:35:22 -0400From: Eric Rotbard
To: Bill Huffman
CC: Derek Smart Subject: Re: Here's my understanding
Mr. Huffman,
<snip stuff to protect the privacy of others , basically Mr. Rotbard says
that I made mistakes and that I'm incorrect. This has bothered him and
Derek and made them unhappy with me. He warns that I had better not
make the changes to the web page. He points out some specific examples
of areas that he believes are fallacious.>
(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((
I am still awaiting a certification from Derek's registrar. Once I
receive it, I will take appropriate action.
I found your proposed amendments offensive and fallacious. I can prove
Derek's Ph. D. any time I wish by revealing this information. I am,
however, awaiting a certification from the registrar which I will
provide to Charles Curran, Esq. and/or Whowhere (and also to annex to a
federal complaint if need be).
To say that "negotiations continued on for over a month and it seemed
that the lawyer's position just kept crumbling more and more." is also
false. We have not been negotiating for over a month. Our negotiations
were limited to the nature of proof that would be acceptable to both
parties which was agreed from close to the outset. The fact that I have
been waiting for a certification has no bearing whatsoever on the
underlying merits, and does not constitute negotiations. If you feel
that you do not want to wait for me to provide this information, that is
your choice.
Your "conclusion" that Derek received his Ph. D. from a "Ph. D. mill" is
false and defamatory.
You are also categorically incorrect by stating that the onus is on
Derek to prove his Ph. D. He doesn't have to prove anything until he
files suit. At that time, you will be held accountable for what youpost.
If your intent was to further antagonize Derek and annoy me, you have
succeeded. Your web page is defamatory as it is. If you amend it
further to include the material in your message to me, I will recommend
to Derek that we go forward and file suit.
My approach to practicing law is that a good lawyer keeps his client out
of court. This approach works when the parties are reasonable.
However, your web page as well as the history of your posts demonstrate
that you are on a personal crusade to villify Derek. I do not believe
that the courts will protect this "speech". If you continue on this
path, I do not see any alternative than litigation. If you amend your
web page, I will take it as a rejection of my attempt to resolve this
matter, and I will take appropriate action.
)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))Sincerely,
Eric Rotbard



To: blebovits who wrote (4651)11/14/2001 10:38:28 PM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6847
 
Blev, The Bad Guys Are Winning

REGIS POSSINO WHO RAN THE DAILY AFFAIRS OF KHASHOGGI'S BOILER ROOM BANK WHICH WAS RECENTLY RAIDED IN AUSTRIA WAS PARTNERS WITH RAYMON D'ONOFRIO. RAMON PASSED AWAY LAST YEAR. MAY HE REST IN PEACE.
ACCORDING TO HARTCOURTS OWN SEC FILINGS REGIS POSSINO WAS THE SIGNER AND PRESIDENT OF FIRST CAPITAL NETWORK. POSSINO ALSO PROMOTED XYBR WITH MARK BERGMAN THE RENOWN STOCK ANALYST WHICH BTW OPERATED OUT OF 2224 MAIN STREET IN SANTA MONICA CALIFORNIA. THE SAME ADDRESS AS MOB TIED RAMON DONOFRIO
----------------------------------------------------------
HARTCOURT COMPANIES INC filed this 10SB12B on 01/21/1997.

"FIRST CAPITAL NETWORK, INC 4,500 /s/ Regis Possino President"
------------------------------------------------------

BELOW IS THE TRUTH ABOUT RAMON D'ONOFRIO CONNECTION TO FIRST CAPITAL NETWORK. RAMON D'ONOFRIO IS JUST ONE IN A LONG LINE OF FRAUDULENT PROMOTERS TIED TO REGIS POSSINO.

Easy Pickings: How Career Swindlers Run Rings Around SEC and Prosecutors ---
White-Collar Crooks Serve Little Jail Time, Leave Billions in Fines Unpaid
--- `The Bad Guys Are Winning'<?b>

By John R. Emshwiller
Staff Reporter of The Wall Street Journal

05/12/1995
The Wall Street Journal

SANTA MONICA, Calif. -- For more than a quarter century, Ramon D'Onofrio has
been playing games with the law -- and mostly winning.
The 67-year-old Mr. D'Onofrio, operating out of a modest office suite at the
airport here, is a master stock swindler. He is responsible for fleecing the
public out of tens of millions of dollars in the course of numerous stock
manipulations, say officials who have tangled with him in about 20 civil and
criminal investigations. A federal appeals court once referred to him as
"ubiquitously criminal."

Mr. D'Onofrio has been convicted of fraud-related crimes five times and is
once again under investigation, people familiar with the case say. Yet he
hasn't spent a day in prison in the past 20 years -- and he served only
about a year behind bars before that. His most recent criminal conviction
came in 1991; he received probation. While the Securities and Exchange
Commission has "permanently" enjoined Mr. D'Onofrio from future violations
of securities laws, it has done so seven different times. Meanwhile, he has
left unpaid about $11.5 million in fines and civil judgments.
Mr. D'Onofrio isn't alone. Hundreds of career swindlers, many of whom have
infiltrated legitimate industries ranging from securities to health care,
are laughing all the way to the bank -- with other people's money. "If you
have the aptitude and you're enough of a sociopath, there are few places
where the pickings are as easy" as swindling, says Scott Stapf,
investor-education adviser for the North American Securities Administrators
Association, a group of state regulators.

Data gathered from government agencies show that it takes far longer to
bring white-collar criminals to justice than perpetrators of other crimes.
Once apprehended and convicted, swindlers generally receive light sentences
-- frequently nothing more than probation and a fine. Often, as with Mr.
D'Onofrio, they aren't compelled to pay back what they have stolen;
extraordinarily, about $4.48 billion in uncollected federal criminal fines
and restitution payments is currently outstanding.

While nobody argues that high-priority battles against drugs and street
crime should be neglected, many white-collar-crime investigators contend
that the devastating impact of fraud isn't sufficiently appreciated. Rough
estimates by government agencies and others indicate that white-collar crime
costs Americans more than $100 billion annually. And increasingly,
free-lance stock swindlers are joining forces with organized crime, to the
benefit of both.

"These are people who are stealing millions from working-class Americans.
These are people who ruin lives," says John Perkins, until recently Missouri
securities commissioner. The former regulator still recalls a Thanksgiving
Day nearly 20 years ago when a local farmer, after having mortgaged his
property and lost the money in an investment swindle, committed suicide by
shooting himself in the head. Quinton Darence Cloninger, who was convicted
of helping run that swindle, was out of prison after three years -- and back
in the investment business. He couldn't be located for comment.

Over the years, Mr. D'Onofrio and his ilk have benefited richly from the
fact that civil authorities don't have much enforcement clout without the
backing of the criminal-justice system. Criminal prosecutors, in turn,
aren't always interested in white-collar offenses -- and may be becoming
less so.

Consider the SEC civil injunctions that Mr. D'Onofrio and others so often
ignore. Violations of such injunctions -- which often bar the individual
from working in the securities industry -- can lead to criminal-contempt
charges and jail time. But, SEC officials concede, contempt is a rarely used
weapon. Records supplied by the SEC show that only a handful of
criminal-contempt cases have been brought in the past five years.

For one thing, the agency has to persuade a U.S. attorney's office to
prosecute a contempt case. The chances of that happening are usually "slim
to none," says one SEC attorney, particularly since criminal-contempt cases
usually don't produce long sentences. Many prosecutors are loath to put in
time on a case where the potential payoff is small.

In 1990, at the SEC's request, the U.S. attorney's office in Salt Lake City
did bring a criminal-contempt case against Mr. D'Onofrio. According to a
complaint filed in federal court there, Mr. D'Onofrio violated a 1982 court
injunction requiring disclosure of his significant stock holdings, an order
that resulted from an earlier SEC lawsuit over stock manipulation. Mr.
D'Onofrio pleaded guilty, was given probation and continued his career
unimpeded.

Mr. D'Onofrio declined numerous requests for an interview for this article.
"Some people do talk to the press and some people don't," says his attorney,
Ira Sorkin, the former head of the SEC's New York regional office. Mr.
D'Onofrio "falls into the latter category," adds Mr. Sorkin, who won't talk
about his client either. (As an assistant U.S. attorney in New York 20 years
ago, Mr. Sorkin helped prosecute a criminal case in which Mr. D'Onofrio was
an unindicted co-conspirator.)

Contempt isn't the only criminal charge available in swindling cases;
frequently, scam artists can be prosecuted criminally under fraud or
racketeering laws. But Philip Feigin, a Colorado regulator and current
president of the North American Securities Administrators Association,
bemoans a "vicious cycle" in which securities regulators, investigators and
prosecutors often relegate criminal statutes to an "afterthought."

One reason is that white-collar criminal cases often eat up enormous amounts
of time and resources. Stewart Walz, a veteran federal prosecutor and former
head of the criminal section of the U.S. attorney's office in Salt Lake
City, recalls one complex white-collar case several years ago that required
a quarter of his section's attorneys for a five-month trial. Although
multiple convictions resulted, Mr. Walz asks: "How many other cases went
unprosecuted?"

On average, it takes more than 10 months for a white-collar criminal case to
be filed in court from the time it is referred to a federal prosecutor's
office, according to national statistics gathered by the Transactional
Records Access Clearinghouse at Syracuse University in New York. That is
nearly three times as long as for the average drug case. Complex,
document-laden white-collar cases frequently take years to complete.

When prosecutors do bring fraud charges, they often end up disappointed with
the sentences that result. The latest federal prison statistics show that
the median jail term for fraud is just 12 months; even violators of
pornography and prostitution laws receive 33 months behind bars, while drug
traffickers are sent away for a median of 60 months. A check of state
sentencing statistics in California and Florida, two centers of white-collar
crime, also shows large disparities in sentences between fraud and drug
trafficking.

James Sepulveda, a prosecutor in the district attorney's office of Contra
Costa County in Northern California, says he has helped convict hundreds of
white-collar criminals during the past 14 years. Some 90% of them, he
estimates, received probation: "The bad guys are winning," he says.

Such experiences have made prosecutors increasingly reluctant to take on
many potentially promising cases. These days, if a case is worth less than
$1 million, some big-city prosecutors won't even touch it, experts say.

A major factor is the nation's war on drugs, which has been overwhelming
prosecutors' offices, courts and prisons. In 1985, for instance, only 34% of
the federal prison population was serving time for drug-related crimes.
Today, the figure is 62%. As recently as the early 1980s, the average
federal prosecutor handled about the same number of white-collar and drug
cases each year, according to the Syracuse University group. By 1993, that
same prosecutor was handling nearly twice as many drug matters as
white-collar cases.

Of the thousands of white-collar cases filed by the federal prosecutors
annually, only several dozen involve alleged securities fraud, according to
records of various government agencies. The SEC keeps only what an agency
spokesman terms a "spongy" count of such cases.

Though Justice Department officials agree that drug cases have been getting
more and more attention, they insist that the agency's commitment to
prosecuting white-collar cases hasn't diminished. They note that in recent
years the department has focused increasingly on particularly complex and
time-consuming white-collar cases. While not great in number, these
prosecutions tend to have a significant impact, they say.

Nonetheless, the scarcity of government record keeping in this area seems to
underscore the relatively low priority given to white-collar crime. The
Federal Bureau of Investigation, for example, annually gathers from more
than 16,000 local and state law-enforcement agencies detailed statistics on
crimes ranging from murder to auto theft. That survey doesn't include fraud,
for which much less detailed information is assembled. FBI officials say
they are working on a new reporting system that will gather more information
on white-collar crimes, but they don't expect it to be in place before the
end of the decade.

For its part, the SEC has established no formal system for identifying or
tracking repeat offenders. Nor does it always know their whereabouts. During
a recent interview, Thomas Newkirk, an associate director for enforcement,
proclaims that Thomas Quinn is safely ensconced in a European jail. But Mr.
Quinn, one of the major stock manipulators of the 1980s -- who regulators
say was responsible for as much as several hundred million dollars in
investor losses world-wide -- has been out of jail for months and is living
on Long Island, N.Y. Mr. Quinn says he isn't involved in the securities
business and "never will be again. I am just trying to get on with my life."

William McLucas, the SEC's enforcement chief, says there "should be a place
in the system" to deal "harshly" with securities-law recidivists, and that
the agency does its best to make sure they are brought to justice. But he
also notes that the SEC has to regulate thousands of public companies and
investment advisers and a vast mutual-fund industry. "We have a whole lot of
market realities we are trying to keep pace with," he says. "So we must make
some hard judgments about where to put resources."

Some of these judgment calls have made life easier for Mr. D'Onofrio. The
two most recent SEC lawsuits against him -- one filed in Los Angeles federal
court in 1993, the other in New York federal court last September -- were
years in the making and involve alleged stock manipulations that occurred,
in some cases, more than a half-decade earlier.

Such time lags aren't uncommon, SEC officials say. The continuing criminal
investigation, which involves some of the same activities as the two civil
cases, also seems to be moving at a glacial pace. Hovhanness "John"
Freeland, an alleged D'Onofrio confederate in one of the civil cases,
pleaded guilty to criminal stock fraud in a related case in New York federal
court. He entered that plea more than two years ago but hasn't been
sentenced yet. Mr. Freeland, who is back in the business world, declines to
be interviewed, and prosecutors won't comment on the criminal case.

When charges are brought against Mr. D'Onofrio, he is as likely to quit as
to fight. Indeed, Mr. D'Onofrio's success with the law has stemmed partly
from his willingness to cooperate when caught. This has helped keep his
incarceration time to a minimum, even though by the early 1970s he was
clearing as much as $1 million annually in stock manipulations, according to
one court ruling.

In one early instance of cooperation, Mr. D'Onofrio agreed to be the main
witness against his former business associate and onetime state-court judge,
Joseph Pfingst, in a bankruptcy-fraud case in Brooklyn, N.Y. Mr. D'Onofrio
was sentenced to probation after helping get Mr. Pfingst convicted; the
former New York judge got a four-month term.

In another case against an alleged co-conspirator, Mr. D'Onofrio testified
readily to his own role as a "manipulator of stocks" who causes "the price
of the stock to rise by fraudulent means and in the process makes a lot of
money," according to a federal-court opinion. But Mr. D'Onofrio has always
been extremely secretive concerning anything that might interfere with his
continuing prosperity. In one case, he was jailed 22 days for contempt
rather than discuss his overseas bank accounts.

Lately, Mr. D'Onofrio has been dabbling in new business ventures, aided by a
1990 SEC rule change. "Regulation S" allows a company to sell stock overseas
without going through the time-consuming and expensive disclosure procedures
normally required to sell new stock in the U.S. The idea is to give
companies a tool for raising capital. Such is the latitude of Regulation S
that the SEC doesn't even track which firms do such transactions.

Law-enforcement officials say they believe Mr. D'Onofrio and others have
been using Regulation S to obtain millions of shares of stock, which they
fail to pay for or buy at a deep discount, then resell to the public before
the price of the stock crashes.

The SEC has voiced concern about possible Regulation S abuses but has done
little to curb them. In 1991, the agency did file suit in Washington, D.C.,
federal court against several defendants in a Regulation S transaction
involving a small Tucson, Ariz., company, Work Recovery Inc. The SEC
obtained injunctions and disgorgement orders against the defendants, whom
the agency charged with failing to pay for 1.5 million Work Recovery shares
and then illegally selling a substantial number of these shares to U.S.
investors.

Though one of Mr. D'Onofrio's firms was Work Recovery's investment banker,
the SEC didn't name him or the firm in its suit. The agency declines to say
why. Work Recovery later sued Mr. D'Onofrio and others in Denver federal
court and won a default judgment of nearly $9.5 million in April 1993. It
remains unpaid.

In a 1992 interview, Work Recovery President Thomas Brandon recalled being
impressed by Mr. D'Onofrio's plush office suite, chauffeured limousine and
seeming dedication to helping small companies such as his raise capital
through Regulation S transactions. Mr. Brandon said the pitch "was almost
evangelical in tone."

Mr. D'Onofrio and his associates recently latched onto another small
publicly traded company, Madera International Inc., a Calabasas, Calif.,
firm with a bizarre past that included plans for an automatic-weapons
factory in China. By last year, Madera had a new business -- exporting
timber from Nicaragua -- and a new investment banker, First Capital Network
Inc.

Mr. D'Onofrio has been operating from First Capital's Santa Monica office.
According to several individuals who have done business with the firm, he
was involved in financing and stock transactions for First Capital, despite
an outstanding court order barring him from "acting as a promoter, finder,
consultant, agent or other person who engages in . . . the issuance or
trading of any security." Repeated requests for comment from company
officials, left by phone and in person at the firm's office, received no
response.

Madera Chairman Daniel Lezak says of Mr. D'Onofrio that "it was my
impression that he helped run the firm." Mr. Lezak says, and SEC filings
confirm, that First Capital arranged the transfer of millions of new shares
of Madera stock to itself or offshore buyers at no cost or at deep discounts
through Regulation S and other transactions. Mr. Lezak says he believes much
of that stock was quickly dumped in the U.S., a move he believes contributed
to Madera stock's dropping to about 10 cents a share from a high last year
of more than $3. Mr. Lezak says he fired First Capital as Madera's
investment banker, but says he still sometimes consults with firm officials.

Mr. D'Onofrio has had serious heart problems of late, law-enforcement
officials say. But he appears to be passing his accumulated knowledge to
others, including his 35-year-old son Mark, who for the past several years
has been working with his father.

Already, the younger Mr. D'Onofrio has been the subject of three SEC
injunctions for alleged securities-law violations. He recently pleaded
guilty in connection with federal conspiracy and fraud charges filed in Los
Angeles federal court as part of the criminal investigation that also
involves his father. Mark D'Onofrio remains free pending sentencing,
scheduled for later this year. His attorney, Mr. Sorkin, says the son, like
the father, doesn't talk to the press.

But Mr. Brandon, the Work Recovery executive, recalls a dinner conversation
where Mark D'Onofrio talked of how he "was proud of his father's doggedness"
and wanted "to follow in his father's footsteps



To: blebovits who wrote (4651)11/14/2001 11:14:21 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 6847
 
Says RAY Donofrio was mob linked. Does this make Regis Possino who promoted xybr mob linked as well?

Mafia-linked penny stock players Joe Garofalo and the late Ramon Donofrio.

B.C. Securities Commission - Street Wire

BCSC Eron player Graye busy juggling lawyers

B.C. Securities Commission *BCSC
Wed 31 Oct 2001 Street Wire
Also WAMEX Holdings Inc (U:*SEC)
Also Securities and Exchange Commission (*CDNX)
Also Canadian Venture Exchange (U:WAMX)

by Brent Mudry

The recent American criminal stock fraud complaint against Michael K.
Graye, snared by the same promoter-turned-informant as jailed Union
Securities broker Trevor Koenig, could not have come at a worse time for
the controversial Vancouver accountant. Mr. Graye's Toronto lawyer, Alan
Gold, is set to appear in Ontario Superior Court of Justice on Thursday to
remove himself as defence counsel in the accountant's $18-million Seven-Up
Canada tax fraud and money laundering case.
Mr. Graye and co-defendant Thomas Baker, an equally high-flying Toronto
lawyer, were committed in May, 2000, to stand trial on six counts of fraud
and one count of laundering the proceeds of crime, following a year-long
preliminary hearing. No trial date has yet been set for the Canadian
blockbuster case, but several pretrial commissions of inquiry are expected,
to gather evidence in the Cayman Islands, the pair's secretive offshore
conduit, and other locations outside Canada.
The Crown alleges the pair effectively looted $18-million in a bust-out of
four companies they took over in controversial leveraged buyouts in 1987
and 1988: Seven-Up Canada, Agnew Shoes and Pathfinder International, all in
Vancouver, and Vancouver Wharves in North Vancouver. Canadian authorities
claim Mr. Graye and Mr. Baker siphoned off $18-million from the companies
through an offshore account, Mogul Holdings in the Cayman Islands,
laundered the money back into Canada, embarked on a big spending spree
including ski chalets at Whistler, sports cars and mansions in Toronto, and
forgot to tell the tax man about it.
The case is one of the biggest and highest profile prosecutions by Revenue
Canada, recently renamed the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency, or CCRA.
Mr. Graye was arrested in December, 1996, in Vancouver by members of the
RCMP Commercial Crime Section, and flown directly to Toronto for his first
court appearance before being released on $1-million bail. The accountant
later emerged as a key behind-the-scenes player, along with controversial
former Vancouver lawyer Martin Chambers, in the $150-million Eron Mortgage
scandal. (All Eron and Canadian court figures are in Canadian dollars.)
In the British Columbia Securities Commission's Eron hearing, Mr. Chambers
was credited as being instrumental in persuading Eron head and master
fraudster Brian Slobogian to loan Mr. Graye $300,000 of Eron investors'
funds to help spring him on his million-dollar bail.
(Vancouver lawyer David Lunny protests the linking of his controversial
client, Mr. Chambers, to the Eron affair. Mr. Lunny says that Mr. Chambers
was not a key behind-the-scenes player in the Eron mortgage fiasco. During
the BCSC hearing, extensive testimony detailed Mr. Chambers's Eron
dealings, including his frequent use of an office within Eron's offices.)
Mr. Graye and Mr. Baker have been free on bail since their arrests five
years ago. Both remain presumed innocent until proven guilty.
While Mr. Graye faces the daunting prospect of preparing for what is
expected to be a mammoth Canadian criminal trial, amid finding a new lawyer
and bringing him up to speed, the controversial accountant now also faces
criminal jeopardy in New York in a new stock fraud case.
In a sealed complaint dated Oct. 1 in the Southern District of New York,
Mr. Graye and New York promoter Roger DeTrano are alleged to have conspired
to manipulate the shares of Mr. Graye's Vinex Wines Inc. through a series
of secretive offshore accounts in the British Virgin Islands and the
Philippines, between January, 2000, and this July. Both men remain presumed
innocent until proven guilty.
(In separate criminal cases, not involving Mr. Graye, Union Securities' big
producer, Mr. Koenig, and Mr. DeTrano, the New York penny stock promoter,
are named as key players in the New York Mafia-linked WAMEX Holdings Inc.
rig job, a promotion which used the Vancouver money laundering account of
Itex Corp. fraud mastermind Terry Neal's Nevis-based Exchange Bank &
Trust.)
Mr. Graye's Vinex criminal case must surely come as a shock to both his New
York Vinex lawyer, Stanley "Stan" Moskowitz, and his loyal Vinex sidekick
Charles Hong Lee. (Recent securities filings show Mr. Graye as the
president of Vinex and Mr. Lee as vice-president.) Neither Mr. Moskowitz
nor Mr. Lee are named in the Vinex criminal case.
Mr. Lee and Mr. Graye go back quite a ways together on Howe Street, the
centre of dealings on the former Vancouver Stock Exchange, dubbed Scam
Capital of the World by writer Joe Queenan in Forbes magazine a decade ago.
From about 1985 through 1993, Mr. Lee was close by Mr. Graye's side in a
number of Howe Street promotions. Both Mr. Graye and Mr. Lee served
assorted concurrent roles with Concert Industries Ltd., Global Election
Systems Inc., Ican Resources Ltd., Macrotrends International Ventures Inc.
and Nanotec Canada Inc. in the mid-1980s and early 1990s, but the pair have
kept lower profiles since.
Mr. Graye's New York lawyer, Mr. Moskowitz, meanwhile, is no stranger to
intriguing Canadian penny stock deals, although he told Stockwatch that
Canadian deals and clients "are not a major part" of his business.
This contrasts with his brief career profile on the Web site of Rosenman &
Colin, a New York law firm he joined as special counsel about a year and a
half ago, when he left Moskowitz Altman & Hughes. "He has practiced
securities and corporate law at both the federal and state levels and has
represented Canadian and other foreign entrepreneurs and companies in
accessing the United States securities markets," states Rosenman & Colin.
The New York law firm notes Mr. Moskowitz concentrates on corporate law and
the "legal aspects of capital formation." "Mr. Moskowitz represents private
and public companies, venture capitalists, underwriters and investment,
private and merchant bankers."
Mr. Moskowitz's star Howe Street client, at least until Mr. Graye came
along, was self-confessed securities violator Larry Kostiuk.
Mr. Kostiuk, a court docket-hound extraordinaire, gained national
prominence in August when a Vancouver bankruptcy court judge found that no
less than 888 bottles of vintage wine mysteriously vanished from the
bankrupt stock promoter's pricey plonk collection. "Mr. Kostiuk lacks
credibility," stated the judge, noting the penny stock promoter's habits of
lying under oath, filing false affidavits and ignoring or breaking court
orders.
Mr. Kostiuk, who served a few years as a rural RCMP officer before
embarking on a 30-year career as a Vancouver penny stock promoter, pleaded
guilty in November, 1996, to six violations of the Securities Act for false
statements, misrepresentations and irregularities in his dealings with
Evergreen International Technology, his former flagship on the former
Vancouver Stock Exchange.
Another charge was stayed, relating to Mr. Kostiuk allegedly defrauding a
close associate, Guido Bensberg, a controversial German financier who has
maintained residences in Switzerland, Florida, Luxembourg and Vancouver.
Mr. Bensberg is a regulatory star in his own right. In May, in one of the
largest trial wins in the history of the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission, Mr. Bensberg was ordered to pay more than $27-million
in disgorgement and penalties for defrauding Bank Leu and Lehman Brothers
of $10-million, part of a $200-million-plus share-leasing scheme he
allegedly masterminded.
Other notable past close associates of Mr. Kostiuk include Mafia-linked
penny stock players Joe Garofalo and the late Ramon Donofrio.

At sentencing in late 1996, the provincial court judge decided to send a
message to the stock market community by handing Mr. Kostiuk a six-month
conditional sentence. Canada, with a long and proud history of breeding,
attracting and harbouring penny stock crooks, rarely sends such white
collar criminals to jail, although occasionally they must endure the
discomfort of an electronic monitoring anklet.
Despite Mr. Kostiuk's guilty pleas, the BCSC has yet to take any action to
ban or restrict his activities in the stock market.
Within a few months of Mr. Kostiuk confessing to be a securities violator,
the New York lawyer was hard at work for the disgraced promoter and his
family. Court filings show that Mr. Moskowitz billed the Kostiuk family's
The Plant Software for work done in February, 1997, on a planned "public
offering," which never materialized.
"This conversation is at an end," Mr. Moskowitz told Stockwatch in late
1997, refusing any comment on his dealings with Mr. Kostiuk. The New York
lawyer was no more talkative on Wednesday, refusing to confirm if Mr.
Kostiuk remains a client. "I don't have any comments," he told a reporter.
Mr. Moskowitz also popped up as securities counsel a year later for
Zeppelin Software, an embryonic penny stock promotion which featured as key
director Scott Lee Kostiuk, then 28, the younger son of the securities
violator, who was fronting for his father. (Scott's Evergreen career had
ended on Oct. 26, 1994, the day the RCMP raided the offices of Evergreen
and Riva Yachts, the Kostiuk family's private holding company.)
It is not clear how much attention Mr. Moskowitz or Scott Kostiuk paid to
the facts in a mid-1999 Zeppelin registration statement they filed with the
SEC. The filing noted that Paul's of North Shore, the thread shop of
Zeppelin front president Paul Minichiello, a North Vancouver tailor who has
been sewing up Howe Street stock deals as long as he has been sewing up
suits, was currently trading on the OTC Bulletin Board. This was news to
Mr. Minichiello, who assured Stockwatch that Paul's of North Shore has been
a private company since it was founded in 1963.
While Mr. Minichiello's own record is clean, he has had an unfortunate
knack for rubbing shoulders with securities violators. Robert Palm and
Robert Poirier, fined $3-million earlier this year by the SEC for their
fraudulent 1994-95 promotion of Garcis U.S.A., emerged as associates of Mr.
Minichiello, the tailor-tout, in a disastrous bid to take his son Dino's
Minichiello Group public in late 1999.
While Mr. Moskowitz claims his Canadian deal pipeline is not a major part
of his work, he has popped up in at least two more Canadian penny stock
deals in the past year or two.
In March, 2000, while still at Moskowitz Altman, the New York lawyer filed
a registration statement for Diasys Corp. Of the three million shares
registered for resale, two-thirds were held by two Toronto shareholders:
B.H. Capital Investments L.P. and Excalibur Limited Partnership, with about
895,000 shares each. (Diasys's board includes Anthony Trowell, who became a
direct of Windswept Environmental Group in November, 1996, after the
1994-96 illegal control and pump-and-dump promotion of the company's shares
by 17 SEC targets, including eight who pleaded guilty to related criminal
charges.)
More recently, this August, Mr. Moskowitz, now at Rosenman & Colin, filed a
registration statement with the SEC for Incitations Inc., a Canadian shell
which features Montreal lawyer Dominique M. Bellemarre as president. Mr.
Bellemarre has served as vice-president and general counsel for Credit
Mutuel since 1998, the year he ended a seven-year career as a senior
partner of Bloomfield Bellemare, a once highly-respected Montreal law firm.
Mr. Bellemare himself has an unblemished reputation, so he was likely quite
shocked in April, when his former long-time partner, Harry Joseph Frederick
Bloomfield, had the misfortune of being named in a 21-count indictment by
Manhattan District Attorney Robert Morgenthau.
Mr. Bloomfield, who collects titles like some people collect postage
stamps, added three new titles to his name: indicted forger, alleged
stock-fraud co-conspirator and offshore mastermind, along with alleged
partner-in-crime Stuart Creggy, an equally prominent London barrister.
The charges capped an extensive and broad international investigation and
followed the guilty pleas of at least three associates. U.S. authorities
claim Mr. Bloomfield and Mr. Creggy set up offshore dodges for scores of
dubious Regulation S penny stock promotions.
The indictment spans 21 years, from 1980 through this March, bridging a
two-decade period which saw Mr. Bloomfield serve in prominent positions
with numerous organizations, including the Quebec Securities Commission and
the federal Business Development Bank. It is unclear whether Mr. Bellemare
had the faintest clue what his partner Mr. Bloomfield was up to.
Meanwhile, Mr. Moskowitz repeatedly denied any comment to Stockwatch on
Wednesday on any of his Canadian clients, including Mr. Kostiuk, Mr. Graye
and Mr. Bellemare.
(Readers wishing more details of Mr. Graye's New York case may refer to a
Street Wire dated Oct. 30, under the Canadian symbols *BCSC and *CDNX, and
the U.S. symbol WAMX.)
(Union's Koenig case is noted in Street Wires dated Sept. 13, Sept. 14,
Sept. 17, Sept. 18, Sept. 20, Sept. 26, Sept. 27, Sept. 28, Oct. 5, Oct. 11
and Oct. 29, under the Canadian symbols *CDNX and *BCSC.)
(Readers wishing more details of the WAMEX case may refer to Street Wires
dated June 14, 2000, June 15, 2000, and Sept. 1, 2000, and the Koenig
pieces, under the U.S. symbol WAMX.)
(Former Itex head Mr. Neal's Exchange Bank & Trust affair is noted in a
28-part Stockwatch series in Street Wires May 4, May 5, May 8, May 9, May
10, May 11, May 12, May 16, May 17, May 18, May 19, May 23, May 24, May 26,
May 29, May 30, June 1, June 5, June 15, Sept. 19, Oct. 6, Oct. 24 and Nov.
30, 2000, Jan. 19, 2001, Jan. 24, 2001, April 3, 2001, May 11, 2001, and
June 21, 2001, under the Canadian symbol BCSC and the U.S. symbol ITEX.)
(c) Copyright 2001 Canjex Publishing Ltd. stockwatch.com