Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Les H who wrote (134596)	11/15/2001 10:26:07 AM
From: Paul Shread	Respond to of 436258

>>Going back to 90, the times where the market made a single spike low and rallied hard, the retracements have to tended to be .62 or greater. << You'd probably find that's the rule if you went back a lot further than that. There was one spike low in the early 60s I know of, maybe one in the 1939 panic, and that's about it. Even 1932 retraced 50% of the initial gains off the bottom, I believe. Also, internals haven't matched any major bottom of the last 35 years, per John Roque (70-90% up day + equally bullish A/D line). Still curious to see what the Carolan/Puetz windows next month will bring...

To: Les H who wrote (134596)	11/15/2001 10:32:34 AM
From: sun-tzu	Respond to of 436258

that works for me Les. we do have some tasty shorts out there. i would be pretty surprised if we dipped as low as .62 nothing's more surprising than what's going on though...LOL added GLW and LJPC to my DIGL long...ggg