Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Jackson who wrote (63757)	11/15/2001 11:31:07 AM
From: Cory Gault	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 275872

"keep it up and I will shower the Intel thread with AMD positive stuff" Interesting. So negative INTC reports are on-topic here but positive INTC reports OT... Rah Rah....

To: Bill Jackson who wrote (63757)	11/15/2001 12:01:44 PM
From: AK2004	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 275872

Bill re: positive stuff I would not call it positive as it verifies that no is buying Itanium yet "Many high performance customers are considering the Itanium Product Family and Linux in their strategic planning. The Silicon Graphics 750 bundle provides an excellent development environment to help them with evaluation of these new exciting developments in 64-bit computing," said Greg Estes Regards -Albert

To: Bill Jackson who wrote (63757)	11/15/2001 1:01:40 PM
From: greg s	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

re: keep it up and I will shower the Intel thread with AMD positive stuff "Keep it up and I ..."????? What the heck have you been doing for days? Your yellow rain is all over the Intel thread.

To: Bill Jackson who wrote (63757)	11/15/2001 3:32:33 PM
From: ptanner	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Bill, Re: "why all the OT stuff? keep it up and I will shower the Intel thread with AMD positive stuff" I agree that many of the the Intel news postings have not been particularly relevant (as well as a lot longer than any value to this thread) and would more appropriately be posted on the Intel thread. However, I don't think a response in kind on the Intel thread is appropriate as this is exactly the problem this thread has continually sought to limit. -PT