Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : War -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Yaacov who wrote (8735)	11/15/2001 2:16:02 PM
From: goldsnow	Respond to of 23908

Alex, terrible events are about to unfold in Dnestr Region while you are preocupied with Lenny (what is it between you two? <g> jmu.edu Those demands are expressed in calls for a greater degree of Gagauz autonomy or, a more radical option, a union with Transdniestria. The latter, one should note, is general stated as a likely response to a hypothetical disastrous situation that does not yet exist even in the eyes of the most radical. Thus, the most elementary demand is for creation of a federalized Moldova in which Comrat will share power with Chisinau. Tiraspol would represent the third element in the three-way split envisioned by the supporters of a federal state. Micheal Kendiglian expressed this demand upon his return from Moscow in late January, 2001 when he declared that he could not imagine Moldova "as anything other than federation between Chisinau, Comrat, and Tiraspol."