SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Homeland Security -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RocketMan who wrote (521)11/15/2001 6:43:32 PM
From: Jill  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 827
 
Only belatedly do politicians now refer to TWA 800 as a bombing. It kind of snuck its way into being accepted and openly referred to that way, years after the fact. They're just not gonna refer to this as sabotage/terrorism. The airline industry would go under! Especially before the holidays.

But why this plane, that is another mystery. I mean, they were going to Santo Domingo. Not exactly the population you care to hit.



To: RocketMan who wrote (521)11/15/2001 7:02:56 PM
From: Ben Wa  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 827
 
If the wake of another jet is responsible for the crash of the jet, then somebody explain how jets manange to survive flying through thunderstorms, wind shears of various directions, etc etc. A 747 takes off a full 2 minutes and 20 seconds before they do, 20 seconds more than the 2 minute minimum. I smell cover up.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News