Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Right Wing Extremist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (20144)	11/16/2001 1:28:07 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 59480

To:X the Unknown who wrote (3978) From: kholt Friday, Nov 16, 2001 1:20 PM View Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3981 Regarding the military trials, I've been reading up on it a bit and I take exception to the provision that a 2/3 majority is required for conviction. If you're going to conduct trials in secret, the jury should be unanimous. That, IMO, is a minimum safeguard. Karen Rubbish. The vote is supposed to be 75% not 66.333% under UCMJ and on top of that any terrorist or his attorney who would sit in front a jury of US soldiers is a complete idiot. They will be much better off in front of the presiding officer with no jury...... JLA