Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neeka who wrote (203421)	11/16/2001 2:53:39 PM
From: DOUG H	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

the relationship you make between mandating the covering of woman from head to toe and categorizing men as "pussies" for doing so. Does that mean that they are afraid of women in some way, and need this mandate in order to control that fear? From my limited understanding, the "reason" they have women cover is for their "protection". I don't buy that for one minute. When you look at how they treat women in it's totality it is clear they are not concerned about their welfare. I think these people are stupid, weak, brutal A-holes. Period. They push around women because they can. We have the same thing here in the US to a limited degree. It's the whole battered women thing. I just have a very strong aversion to strong people pushing around the weak. I think these people are the weak ones. Look at how they perform in combat. What's this crap about turning yourself in to the other side, then fighting along side him?