Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Petz who wrote (148539)	11/16/2001 5:44:53 PM
From: wanna_bmw	Respond to of 186894

Petz, Re: "Typical Intellatubbie logic. It is not hypocritical to post to Paul. It would be hypocritical to post like Paul." Isn't "Intellatubbie" the kind of remark you should consider hypocritical? Or is there a list of "ok" and "not-ok" words that can and can't be used when having a discussion? Does your idea of moderation always conform to such exact kinds of behavior? My point is, and the points of others here, is that you have some nerve to preach what is, and what is not, alright to say when having a discussion. Different people are going to have their own versions of tolerable behavior, and moderating by trying to differentiate black and white in a grey kind of world is just idiotic. We all know that in the end, the AMDroids are going to make their own kinds of rules. I've seen it, and so have the others. The AMDroids get away with pushing the envelope, because they represent the majority crowd. Anyone spouting contrary opinions either gets ostracized, or banned. Any attempts to justify this is immediately seen through be even the casual observer. So stop trying to cover up the reality. The AMD thread wants to run things their way, and fundamentally, that's going to favor AMD; realistically, you can never have a completely polite and decent thread with the kinds of controversial opinions that come from trading competing stocks. Live with it. wbmw

To: Petz who wrote (148539)	11/16/2001 5:48:47 PM
From: semiconeng	Respond to of 186894

Typical Intellatubbie logic. It is not hypocritical to post to Paul. It would be hypocritical to post like Paul. But it seems to be the Intellatubbies that, even on the Intel thread, lash out with personal attacks, profanity and charges of Taliban-mind-control. Petz You seem to be doing a very good job of "Posting Like Paul", while at the same time criticizing him.

To: Petz who wrote (148539)	11/16/2001 5:55:28 PM
From: Cory Gault	Respond to of 186894

"It is not hypocritical to post to Paul. It would be hypocritical to post like Paul." What a joke you guys are!!! Milo, you, win, albert all vote to ban Paul because you can't stand his style but can't wait to get over here and continue the banter. The volume of posts on this thread has increased dramatically and the AMD police state thread is drying up and has become as entertaining as reading the dictionary.....Jackson is the worst of them. Hypocrisy reigns supreme...what a joke!!! Kapkan coming over here and throwing an unsolicited post to Paul is probably the funniest of all. CG

To: Petz who wrote (148539)	11/16/2001 10:42:15 PM
From: SisterMaryElephant	Respond to of 186894

John, <It would be hypocritical to post like Paul. But it seems to be the Intellatubbies that, even on the Intel thread, lash out with personal attacks, profanity and charges of Taliban-mind-control.> Right. Here is my post to you. I use words like "please" and ask you a question. Message 16670012 Here is your reply. Message 16670880 You are rude and profane. You use words like, "idiot" and "diatribe", and the always self-satisfying, "do you understand?" Being a hypocrite is the least of your problems. Tough. SK