Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: greenspirit who wrote (203548)	11/16/2001 7:41:43 PM
From: JEB	Respond to of 769670

Ouch, ...you knocked that argument out the park. I believe it's called a "Grand Slam Home Run".

To: greenspirit who wrote (203548)	11/16/2001 7:42:51 PM
From: Mr. Whist	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 769670

The National Right to Work (For Less) is a highly charged and biased organization, not unlike newsmax.com. Because of that fact, I do not find their stories credible.

To: greenspirit who wrote (203548)	11/16/2001 9:48:54 PM
From: Mr. Whist	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

I suppose I do owe you a reply based on the time you spent trying to find a disparaging story, even though the source of your information is the National Right to Work for Less organization and the story is 5 years old. (Is this really the best you could do?) What did Dalonzo do to raise the ire of the Teamsters? Why did Sikorsky go along with the Teamsters' recommendation for dismissal? Is this story representative of anything? Is there a universal truth that we can extract from this nugget? Do I need to post more stories of companies steamrolling over workers' rights? If so, what would that prove? There's plenty of good and not-so-good on both sides.