Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: marginmike who wrote (21448)	11/17/2001 3:12:16 PM
From: AllansAlias	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 209892

Why do you persist in posting these FA arguments to me? -bg I do not find the argument compelling. If QCOM got to $200 at the height of the world's most outrageous bubble, it is a fantasy to think that it can get back to that level anytime in the next many, many years. How long did it take stocks to get back to their 1929 levels? How long did it take to get back to the 1966 levels? I don't care if all of Asia and Africa gets cellphones. I don't care if pets start wearing the chips in their collars. I don't care if every appliance comes embedded with the damn things. Even if wireless technology starts showing up in f*cking lightbulbs I don't care. There will be competition and alternatives, and saying that QCOM has patent protection is meaningless. The developments going forward won't be linear enough to count on. [Please, can we stop now. -g/ng]