SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (37193)11/17/2001 5:39:11 PM
From: J. C. Dithers  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
I would choose to have the pregnancy terminated. But what does this tell us? Only that I would not doom my wife to the probability of death as a trade-off for the possibility of saving a viable fetus. Does this tell us anything about how one values human life?

You might as well play the game of, "You are at the beach. Your son and daughter are caught in a rip-tide. They are far apart. You can only save one. Who would you save?"

Rather than forcing hypothetical, far-fetched, Draconian choices on people who revere all life ... you might turn your attention to girls who are aborting babies for no better reason than that the senior prom is coming up, and their dress wouldn't fit right. That might accomplish something worthwhile.



To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (37193)11/17/2001 6:58:48 PM
From: The Philosopher  Respond to of 82486
 
It's simple. We already have an extensive body of law on this issue. It's the self-defense issue. If another person is threatening your life, you have the right to kill them. Even if they are doing so without intending any harm to you. Self-preservation is an absolute right.

So if it is necessary for the mother's life to terminate the pregnancy, she has every right to do so under existing principles of law.

It's a non issue.