Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: wanna_bmw who wrote (148761)	11/18/2001 3:28:25 PM
From: Joseph Pareti	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Great post, wanna_bmw, very informative and badly needed to defuse the FUD spread out by the "competition". Which looks like kind of desperate.

To: wanna_bmw who wrote (148761)	11/18/2001 3:45:40 PM
From: milo_morai	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 186894

<font color=blue>Business Market Share gains By: surprising Reply To: None Sunday, 18 Nov 2001 at 3:29 PM EST Post # of 89074 Some very good AMD news, new marketshare numbers, maybe it has been already posted. US marketshare according to Dataquest : -Consumer from 24,6% to 31,6% -Small Business from 21,2% to 39,8% -Middle Business from 9,4% to 27,5% -Large Business from 1,4% to 6,7% I like the new Large Business marketshare heise.de ragingbull.lycos.com SWEET! M.

To: wanna_bmw who wrote (148761)	11/18/2001 11:15:40 PM
From: Dan3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Re: The 450NX was a 4-way chipset Yes, that was in the article that I posted to you. Intel had a terrible time when it tried to develop 4-way and 8-way chipsets. I think it was more corrollary and Compaq that bailed out Intel's SMP chipset mess than serverworks. But Intel did fail when it tried to develop its own 4-way and 8-way chipsets. When their internal efforts failed, they bought corrollary, and when they couldn't do it even with corrollary they had to get help from Compaq. I guess they've decided to go to the source, since they've now bought out Compaq's high end group. But the fact remains that Intel's high end efforts failed, and they had to get bailed out the 450NX was not a Serverworks chipset Which was the point of my post. Compaq and Dell had to go with Serverworks because even after buying corrollary, Intel couldn't get profusion to work until they were bailed out by Compaq. There appears to be something about Intel's corporate culture that makes it impossible for them to develop new products, anymore. They had to get bailed out on their attempt at a server CPU design by HP, they had to get bailed out on their attempt at a server chipset design by Compaq, and their own P4 design is a real mess. Corollary, a wholly owned subsidiary of Intel, and Compaq codeveloped the Profusion 8-way system architecture. http://www.winntmag.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=7273