Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MeDroogies who wrote (11184)	11/19/2001 10:46:25 AM
From: Cogito Ergo Sum	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74559

Hi MeDroogies, I still believe this was pure luck on their part, was only 25% successful I don't know if pure luck but I'd have to agree that it's starting to look like a one of event. Here's hoping. regards Kastel a cute and cuddly Canadian

To: MeDroogies who wrote (11184)	11/23/2001 11:43:02 PM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74559

Hello MeDroogies, Given that you had uncommonly believed stock indices are not leading indicators but are lagging indicators, I just figured your comments concerning the economy is based on a recovery you already see, as opposed to a recession that you believed would not happen and that is so very clearly and indisputably in play now. Now, regarding <<Bubbles burst constantly, with most smaller than this one, but usually with the same result...recession, stagnation, recovery. The size of the initial bubble is less important than the reaction afterward.>> This too is uncommon, and as usual, I urge caution at matters I do not understand, and repeat my conviction that “anticipation is a survival skill”, but as you seem to have a fine grasp of the facts, implications, and the way forward, I leave you to the journey and will check back at a later time. Chugs, Jay