SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Piffer Thread on Political Rantings and Ravings -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (4415)11/19/2001 12:23:37 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14610
 
Wind Shear is detectable, but not from the cockpit. After the Delta Airlines crash at the DFW airport, I believe most, if not all airports had equipment installed that could detect wind shear/microbursts.



To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (4415)11/19/2001 12:29:02 PM
From: Original Mad Dog  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14610
 
I think they should be looking into the possibility that the tail fin was sheared off by a giant sausage.



To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (4415)11/19/2001 12:33:26 PM
From: Doppler  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14610
 
Wind shear is detectable only from a network of deployed sensors. Such sensors are arrayed around airports and detect wind shears etc only at the level at which they are installed. ie ground to maybe 100 ft. Doppler radar can detect shears but only if there is something moving in the air like rain etc.



To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (4415)11/19/2001 12:40:56 PM
From: MulhollandDrive  Respond to of 14610
 
The notion that the tail of a plane could snap cleanly off in flight even with what may be considered above normal turbulence is obviously unacceptable.

Turbulence "happens".