Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mike Magee who wrote (64039)	11/19/2001 5:56:05 PM
From: peter_luc	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Mike, "Eva got a letter from Paul Engel saying that the current draw was 1.70 amp - and the PDF should be ftp://download.intel.com/design/mobile/datashts/29834002.pdf " Ali had already stated exactly that in post 64032: "In "mobile" chips they drop the sleep voltage down to 0.85V, where the leakage goes down to about 1.7A." PLEASE, can someone in the know put more light into this??? Peter

To: Mike Magee who wrote (64039)	11/19/2001 7:07:54 PM
From: Ali Chen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Mike, "...and the PDF should be..." Can someone explain to me why these .pdfs from Intel Web "should not be": ftp://download.intel.com/design/PentiumIII/datashts/24976501.pdf ftp://download.intel.com/design/PentiumIII/datashts/24965702.pdf but the Engel's ftp://download.intel.com/design/mobile/datashts/29834002.pdf should? Why Engel's.pdf is "right", and mine's are "wrong"? Thanks, - Ali :-) :-)