SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kapkan4u who wrote (148901)11/20/2001 12:20:59 AM
From: Robert Salasidis  Respond to of 186894
 
However there is always a difference between typical and maximum in any datasheet (a small wireless device I am embedding into a prodyct has a maximum sleep current of 50uA, but by my measurements (not characterized by the manufacturer) typical ranges closer to 7uA.

Presumably all sources of input signals are shut down along with the CPU during sleep, so I would think that your point is likely accurate. However that is not were the crux of the argument was.



To: kapkan4u who wrote (148901)11/20/2001 12:23:06 AM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
There is no difference between typical and max signal loading in deep sleep mode.

Kap, leakage current vrs die temp is non linear. You are ignoring this. Without AMD data for leakage at Tjmax you can not conclude anything.

EP


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News