Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ali Chen who wrote (149006)	11/20/2001 9:28:06 PM
From: Robert Salasidis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

And I still stand by the fact that the 50% power going to leakage current values are at full voltage, and full Tj (100 degC). The equivalent values are not present on the AMD datasheets (as far as I found). I have extrapolated some data from the AMD AThlon 4 datasheet however At 1.4V and 1.1GHz 17.9A at 1.4V and 850MHz 15.71A (this seems very similar to the rate of current drop vs frequency as the PIII Mobile 1.13GHz 18.1A at 1.4V vs 15.87A at 866MHz at 1.4V). Assuming that current should scale linearly with frequency at a given voltage, then it seems both CPUs are behaving very similarly as far as current consumption when extrapolated to 0Hz. I suspect leakage will be an increased problem at 0.09u - and would be interested in hearing any predictions/expectations as to the above. As per Intel, the benefits of SOI are decreased at these dimension levels. Can anyone explain the reason for this?