To: Neocon who wrote (38130 ) 11/21/2001 3:22:55 PM From: E Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 82486 This is CH's original fictional scenario. I posted the link and bolded the scenario in the summary post I made to you, actually. In it, he says:The post of Poet's that started all this, back about a month or so ago, made negative inferences about our young men in uniform, which I took personal exception to since (as Poet well knows) my son is serving proudly in the Air Force defending the rights of certain people to continue to think and write what they do. Message 16686046 If it's the term "casting aspersions on" you're looking for, here I ask the question "Poet never cast any aspersion whatever on our "young men," such as your son, did she?"Message 16685865 and CH replies, "Yes."Message 16686046 (That's just one place.) In my summary post to you I also provided my intuition, which is similar to yours, I see, about what sent CH into the fantasy scenario containing the lie about Poet.Message 16682698 Here is an excerpt from the above in which I attempt to offer an emotional explanation for CH's continuing disreputable behavior in this matter: "Maybe you are very worried about your son, and that is a true excuse. It's humanly understandable to wish those who question the wisdom or rightness of your son's choices, and of those of the Commander in Chief, would shut up. You know your son is brave, you believe the cause is just, and you don't want to hear it. I sometimes want people who take the Katha Pollitt/Oliver Stone positions, or variations thereon, to shut up, too. But for better or worse (worse when it is your particular ox you feel gored by freedom of speech), this is America. And however upset you are to hear dissent, it doesn't make your claim that "Poet made negative inferences about our young men in uniform" true. It wasn't true. You made it up."