SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Charles P. Hubbard who wrote (135436)11/21/2001 3:57:29 PM
From: S. maltophilia  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
It was a pro forma surplus.



To: Charles P. Hubbard who wrote (135436)11/21/2001 4:27:33 PM
From: Win-Lose-Draw  Respond to of 436258
 
If we could not generate a surplus anytime during the prosperous '90's, under what conditions would a surplus be possible?

Come on now, that question is clearly out of bounds. It's like asking "If <insert fave telecom startup> couldn't make money during the biggest buildout in history when will it make money?". Since the likes of you is clearly unable to control the intellect we need a constitutional ammendment outlawing such inflammatory language.

If we cannot with impunity buy stocks with infinite P/Es, the terrorists have already won.



To: Charles P. Hubbard who wrote (135436)11/22/2001 12:34:54 AM
From: LLCF  Respond to of 436258
 
< If we could not generate a surplus anytime during the prosperous '90's, under what conditions would a surplus be possible? >

Exactly... anyone who didn't get that is really quite naive. You ask someone who believed a surplus was coming what would happen if a recession came along [still not in the numbers!] and they said.... 'what?'

DAK


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News