Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : America Under Siege: The End of Innocence -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DeplorableIrredeemableRedneck who wrote (10898)	11/22/2001 11:33:04 AM
From: Lola	Respond to of 27666

I interpret that to mean you feel his pending martyrdom will rouse the vast majority (of Muslims) to commit heinous acts against the West in a perverted attempt to avenge him? Probably not heinous acts but many will try to do things that we may find annoying ... anonymously of course ... i.e. endless bomb threats. But I think the U.S. government will take care of the offenders appropriately and in time the Muslim nuts in the U.S. will all fall into line. Jihad and getting their asses kicked seem to be the only two things alot of these people understand. We may not know much about Jihad but we do know how to kick their asses ... that will take us far in the fight against terrorism. The Muslims I find the scariest are the ones from Saudi Arabia. They have the desire and money to pull off acts of terror in the U.S. ... they have to all be stopped ... I don't know how we'll manage that without going to war with Saudi Arabia or dramatically changing their regimes. When a country's government can't control it's people from committing major acts of violence on another country that means that government should be replaced. Saudi Arabia is much worse than Afghanistan in many ways. Afghanistan has crazy people but Saudi Arabia has crazy people with money ... they are the real threat. If bin Laden hadn't gone to Afghanistan the Taliban would have been limited to terrorizing Afghans and possibly Kashmiris ... the Taliban would not have been able to hurt the U.S. in any way without the bin Laden (Saudi Arabia) connection. Lola:)

To: DeplorableIrredeemableRedneck who wrote (10898)	11/22/2001 11:51:01 AM
From: lorne	Respond to of 27666

Darren. You said...." >I still say that the vast majority of muslims will think he is a saint and act accordingly.< ----------------------- I interpret that to mean you feel his pending martyrdom will rouse the vast majority (of Muslims) to commit heinous acts against the West in a perverted attempt to avenge him? I think your Turban is fastened on crooked."..... Well you interpeted wrong. First of all I really can't stand even a picture of this slimy, filthy, murderous fanatical religious nut case...( and them are his finer points )... As you well know when I referred to the vast majority of muslims I was referring to those not in THE WEST. I was refering to those muslims who live in countries that we may consider backwards and it is these muslims that I think may not see benny for what he really is .... a murderous, filthy, camel smelling, stupid, scumbag..etc I was not implying that his martyrdom would cause any more acts of terror in our countries although it could well do just that...( not sure how you came up with that ).... however it could well cause increased acts of terror in their own countries. Go back and read what I posted....Hey it may be your turban that's on to tight. :o)