Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Jackson who wrote (149225)	11/23/2001 7:52:53 AM
From: Dave	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Bill, Regardless, AMD started this fight. Intel went for the kill. Now AMD can supply about 32-35% flat out, so Intel could add $200 to each CPU and so would AMD. In a few years they would both make a bundle First off, that would smell of collusion. Next, AMD would never be happy with the low ASP market place. Intel is a juggernaut to compete against. You can't directly compete against Intel's offerings, you have to indirectly compete.

To: Bill Jackson who wrote (149225)	11/23/2001 11:58:20 AM
From: Windsock	Respond to of 186894

Billy Ban - Re:"AMD came along a slight bit under Intel" When the K6 was introduced Jerry "the Marketing Genius" Sanders brayed to the world that AMD would sell its processor 25% below Intel for an similar speed. AMD has continued to sell at about that level below Intel, plus or minus, ever since. That is not a little bit !! What it produces are losses for 5 out of 6 years as AMD tries to put the "hurt" on Intel with its Jerryhad. Meanwhile, the AMDroids cheer loudly.