SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Hawkmoon who wrote (11311)11/24/2001 1:46:43 AM
From: KLP  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Well said Hawk!!! We could also perhaps give the enemy a choice: our punishment, or the one his country proscribes....

....would reveal that said civilization is a conscious voluntary choice made by societies who normally don't have to worry about being threatened with their destruction from uncivilized people.

And since choosing to be civilized is strictly voluntary, so is the choice to deal with one's enemies in a manner which they would deal with you.



To: Hawkmoon who wrote (11311)11/24/2001 10:26:52 AM
From: 49thMIMOMander  Respond to of 281500
 
"would reveal that said civilization is a conscious voluntary choice made by societies who normally don't have to
worry about being threatened with their destruction from uncivilized people." (what about leaving out
the un-??)

I think this was popular in the nationalistic and colonizing, romantic 1800s, needing all excuses they
could find.

With a little of the then "liberal" ideas and the concepts of "free choice" and some
"rationality" sprinkled in, during the process of having to consider that Darwin seemed
to claim even the aristocrates are monkeys.

Ilmarinen

Btw, both Islamic Fundamentalism and some western values seem to have that revenge and
retaliation in common, which according to more general definitions of "civilization" is
what should be done in a different way.