Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : War -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas M. who wrote (9271)	11/24/2001 10:07:04 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Respond to of 23908

No, that isn't what being "more anti-Saddam than anyone" means. It means opposing his principles, not just opposing him because of which side of a particular battle line he stands, as the Israelis and the oil money crowd does. So it's more "anti-Saddam" to cluck about him in principle, than to ever want to do anything about the threat he poses? I see. Besides, that's not true either. Chomsky calls Saddam a thug in passing, but he has no interest in his crimes or his victims and never dwells on them. To do so would only deflect the spotlight from his one concern, the 'crimes' of the US.