Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: fyodor_ who wrote (149444)	11/26/2001 12:30:20 AM
From: wanna_bmw	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Fyo, Re: "Not sure if I'm a 'Droid in your mind or not" You're not. ;-) Re: "You might want to try and set a good example for the other Intellabees, and refute the nonsense Paul is excreting when you disagree with him" Most of what Paul is saying is not nonsense. If you have CPUs that consistently get reviewed with problems, whether or not the cause is with the CPU, this will obviously have a lasting effect on the readers of the article. Try to read between the lines, and you'll realize that Paul is not as stupid as the people he's arguing against. wbmw

To: fyodor_ who wrote (149444)	11/26/2001 12:33:00 AM
From: Tony Viola	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Fyo, You might want to try and set a good example for the other Intellabees, and refute the nonsense Paul is excreting when you disagree with him ;-)) Why? Between Intel and AMD, it would be pretty incredible if their chips were equally stable, exactly. Since it is possible to find more examples cited on the Internet of AMD based system instability problems, than Intel, and there are 4 or 5X as many Intel, it doesn't take complex math or logic to come to a conclusion here. Tony