SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (38738)11/26/2001 11:37:58 AM
From: Mac Con Ulaidh  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 82486
 
Micheal Jackson? He has gone to great lengths to change his "born" look. Why on earth would he clone himself? Sounds like just picking a perceived "freak" as a target for not wanting someone to clone themselves. If thoughts get transferred, wouldn't someone hateful and dangerous being more worrisome? Why would another Micheal bother anyone, unless he just "freaks them out" by his existence as the person he wants to be? It would hardly hurt the world, and might bring another round of musical talent, which he has whether anyone personally likes his music. He does seem to get to people, tho.

I slipped. :)



To: Lane3 who wrote (38738)11/26/2001 12:10:45 PM
From: thames_sider  Respond to of 82486
 
I suppose it might be, since it's a word I'd certainly use... but I may have had subliminal linkage to 'visage', as in 'the visage of Michael Jackson'...

Feel free to use it and see if people take you for a Brit <gg>


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News