SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: AK2004 who wrote (149550)11/26/2001 12:30:46 PM
From: wanna_bmw  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
albert

1) there have been plenty of articles about Intel's terahertz transistor. I strongly suggest you read those first.
2) I have no idea what you're talking about
3) I don't doubt that amd will try to use model numbers to achieve whatever arbitrary value they want. the problem is that Intel's cpus will deliver real frequencies, and ipc will improve over time, thus making amd's model numbers irrelevant.

Regards
-BMW



To: AK2004 who wrote (149550)11/26/2001 12:48:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Albert, <so why is that that amd can not use model numbers that have more meaning than THz transistor>

Never fear. AMD will soon announce plans for a "QeraHertz transistor" that will switch at whatever speed AMD's marketing department says it will.

Tenchusatsu



To: AK2004 who wrote (149550)11/26/2001 5:21:08 PM
From: Robert Salasidis  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 186894
 
TraHertz as used by Intel would refer to transistor switching speeds, not CPU frequencies (the press release was explicitly for their transistor technology).

I am not sure what the specs of their transistors are, but if they can achieve 1pS switching speed, then they can call it a a Terahertz transistor.