Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mac Con Ulaidh who wrote (38999)	11/27/2001 1:31:55 PM
From: Tom Clarke	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

I was a dist Do you mean ditz? (I never thought you were ditz, btw. Or a dist.)

To: Mac Con Ulaidh who wrote (38999)	11/27/2001 1:38:06 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

Well, the incident is vague to me. I apologize, once again, if I behaved badly. I cannot even remember a reading list (a lot of water under the bridge). I will say that if I made one, it probably was not with the assumption that you had read nothing on it, but to show some works that I thought important to what I was talking about, whether or not you had read them. But maybe I was just a prick......

To: Mac Con Ulaidh who wrote (38999)	11/27/2001 1:55:28 PM
From: Solon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

Even though I know our religious beliefs might be somewhat different (you might be surprised, however, at my range of support)...this post was right on, honest, and very insightful...

To: Mac Con Ulaidh who wrote (38999)	11/27/2001 6:13:28 PM
From: TimF	Respond to of 82486

Choosie this conversational thread goes back to a discussion about the use of nuclear weapons in Japan to end WWII. Neo said "It was hard to get weapons- grade uranium." and you replied And? Have you figured out yet that I've read some of them books you like to reference? (the goofy one who makes a lot of fun of herself) I assume that you are referenceing something else, either much earlier on this thread or on another thread. Am I correct in that assumption? If that assumption is correct I will just stay our of something that I am totally ignorant of. Tim