SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Charles Gryba who wrote (149851)11/27/2001 2:58:25 PM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Re: "what the hell are you talking about? "

What the hell are you talking about?

Where has Intel even mentioned a 64 bit extension to the x86 architecture?



To: Charles Gryba who wrote (149851)11/27/2001 11:28:26 PM
From: wanna_bmw  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Constantine, the problem is that you are taking it for granted that Intel will *need* to respond to AMD's 64-bit instruction set in the desktop market. Why do you make this assumption, other than what Paul is suggesting, which is the AMDroid fantasy that every AMD initiative will require an immediate Intel response.

wbmw


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News